LivingGLP1
Network meta-analysis

Percent body weight change

Overweight or obesity without diabetes (adults)

weeks 20 to 40 (target week 26)Not stated by the trialsDoses of a drug pooledMean difference
13
Randomized trials
10
Treatments
2,153
Participants
26
Trial arms

In plain language

Across 13 trials with 2,153 participants, 5 of 9 treatments had a clearly better result than placebo on percent body weight change, and for 4 the evidence could not tell them apart from placebo. The most favorable estimate was for Bofanglutide (GZR18) injection: mean difference -12.54 percentage points (95% credible interval -20.09 to -4.09).

Lower values favor the treatment. "Clearly" means the 95% credible interval excludes no difference. These are averages across trials; they do not say how any one person will respond. Not medical advice.

Network of trials

Each circle is a treatment; each line joins treatments that were randomized against each other in at least one trial.
BOFANG_SCEFPE_SCEXENER_SCEXEN_SCLIRA_SCMAZD_SCORFO_POPLACEBOSEMA_SCSTANDARD_CARE
Node area shows participants; line width shows trials comparing two treatments directly. Blue: GLP-1 receptor agonist containing treatments; grey: comparators. Hover over or tab to a node or line for details.

Effects compared with Placebo

Mean difference in percentage points. Lower values favor the treatment.
-25-20-15-10-50510← favors treatmentfavors reference →Bofanglutide (GZR18) injectionMazdutide injectionOrforglipron tabletSemaglutide injectionEfpe scLiraglutide injectionExenatide extended release injec…Exenatide injectionStandard care or no added treatm…
Versus Placebo. Blue: Bayesian random effects posterior median with 95% credible interval (thick) and 95% prediction interval (dashed). Amber diamond: frequentist estimate with 95% confidence interval. Hover over or tab to a row for its values.
Effects of each treatment versus Placebo
TreatmentBayesian MD (95% CrI)95% prediction intervalFrequentist MD (95% CI)Verdict
Bofanglutide (GZR18) injection
BOFANG_SC
-12.54 (-20.09 to -4.09)-23.54 to -1.08-13.12 (-20.52 to -5.71)Better
Mazdutide injection
MAZD_SC
-12.29 (-17.93 to -6.47)-22.03 to -2.53-12.67 (-18.09 to -7.26)Better
Orforglipron tablet
ORFO_PO
-9.03 (-16.72 to -0.84)-20.00 to 2.26-9.33 (-16.72 to -1.94)Better
Semaglutide injection
SEMA_SC
-8.66 (-14.55 to -2.75)-18.63 to 1.49-9.01 (-14.49 to -3.52)Better
Efpe sc
EFPE_SC
-6.81 (-14.60 to 0.97)-18.14 to 4.47-7.13 (-14.42 to 0.16)Unclear
Liraglutide injection
LIRA_SC
-5.16 (-9.81 to -0.42)-14.66 to 4.03-5.22 (-9.50 to -0.94)Better
Exenatide extended release injection
EXENER_SC
-3.94 (-11.82 to 4.09)-14.96 to 7.15-4.20 (-11.72 to 3.32)Unclear
Exenatide injection
EXEN_SC
-3.18 (-10.98 to 4.32)-14.56 to 7.54-3.30 (-10.54 to 3.94)Unclear
Standard care or no added treatment
STANDARD_CARE
-0.79 (-9.49 to 8.42)-12.62 to 11.23-0.80 (-9.28 to 7.68)Unclear

Ranking

How likely each treatment is to be among the best. Rankings ignore the size of differences and their certainty, so read them with the effects above.

League table

Every treatment against every other: mean difference of the row treatment versus the column treatment, posterior median and 95% credible interval. Green: row clearly better; red: row clearly worse.
Every treatment in a row compared with every treatment in a column
Row versus columnPLACEBOBOFANG_SCMAZD_SCORFO_POSEMA_SCEFPE_SCLIRA_SCEXENER_SCEXEN_SCSTANDARD_CARE
PLACEBOPLACEBO12.54
4.09 to 20.09
12.29
6.47 to 17.93
9.03
0.84 to 16.72
8.66
2.75 to 14.55
6.81
-0.97 to 14.60
5.16
0.42 to 9.81
3.94
-4.09 to 11.82
3.18
-4.32 to 10.98
0.79
-8.42 to 9.49
BOFANG_SC-12.54
-20.09 to -4.09
BOFANG_SC-0.25
-9.64 to 9.84
-3.49
-14.54 to 7.63
-3.95
-13.21 to 6.41
-5.73
-16.38 to 5.88
-7.38
-16.23 to 2.50
-8.63
-19.53 to 3.22
-9.40
-19.78 to 2.56
-11.77
-23.50 to 1.04
MAZD_SC-12.29
-17.93 to -6.47
0.25
-9.84 to 9.64
MAZD_SC-3.24
-13.16 to 6.38
-3.66
-11.53 to 4.84
-5.42
-15.21 to 4.41
-7.17
-14.49 to 0.68
-8.34
-18.19 to 1.38
-9.08
-18.56 to 0.24
-11.48
-21.95 to -0.66
ORFO_PO-9.03
-16.72 to -0.84
3.49
-7.63 to 14.54
3.24
-6.38 to 13.16
ORFO_PO-0.41
-9.96 to 9.89
-2.17
-13.16 to 8.88
-3.84
-12.83 to 5.50
-5.06
-16.18 to 6.10
-5.90
-16.55 to 5.60
-8.23
-20.17 to 3.55
SEMA_SC-8.66
-14.55 to -2.75
3.95
-6.41 to 13.21
3.66
-4.84 to 11.53
0.41
-9.89 to 9.96
SEMA_SC-1.80
-11.47 to 7.64
-3.44
-11.19 to 3.97
-4.67
-14.42 to 4.94
-5.48
-14.90 to 4.27
-7.88
-18.69 to 2.68
EFPE_SC-6.81
-14.60 to 0.97
5.73
-5.88 to 16.38
5.42
-4.41 to 15.21
2.17
-8.88 to 13.16
1.80
-7.64 to 11.47
EFPE_SC-1.67
-10.69 to 7.66
-2.81
-14.19 to 8.23
-3.60
-14.60 to 7.48
-6.03
-18.11 to 5.90
LIRA_SC-5.16
-9.81 to -0.42
7.38
-2.50 to 16.23
7.17
-0.68 to 14.49
3.84
-5.50 to 12.83
3.44
-3.97 to 11.19
1.67
-7.66 to 10.69
LIRA_SC-1.19
-10.47 to 7.95
-1.95
-11.03 to 7.15
-4.43
-12.10 to 3.41
EXENER_SC-3.94
-11.82 to 4.09
8.63
-3.22 to 19.53
8.34
-1.38 to 18.19
5.06
-6.10 to 16.18
4.67
-4.94 to 14.42
2.81
-8.23 to 14.19
1.19
-7.95 to 10.47
EXENER_SC-0.84
-11.78 to 10.31
-3.19
-15.33 to 8.80
EXEN_SC-3.18
-10.98 to 4.32
9.40
-2.56 to 19.78
9.08
-0.24 to 18.56
5.90
-5.60 to 16.55
5.48
-4.27 to 14.90
3.60
-7.48 to 14.60
1.95
-7.15 to 11.03
0.84
-10.31 to 11.78
EXEN_SC-2.36
-14.27 to 9.08
STANDARD_CARE-0.79
-9.49 to 8.42
11.77
-1.04 to 23.50
11.48
0.66 to 21.95
8.23
-3.55 to 20.17
7.88
-2.68 to 18.69
6.03
-5.90 to 18.11
4.43
-3.41 to 12.10
3.19
-8.80 to 15.33
2.36
-9.08 to 14.27
STANDARD_CARE

Heterogeneity, fit and convergence

Bayesian random effects (primary)

Heterogeneity (tau)
3.497 (95% CrI 1.740 to 6.822)
Residual deviance
25.6 for 25 data points
DIC
50.3 (pD 24.7)
Largest R-hat
1.001
Smallest ESS
bulk 2,684, tail 3,232
Divergent transitions
0
Convergence
All criteria met
Priors
PR01 N(0, 35^2); PR03 N(0, 17.5^2); PR07 half normal(0, 3.5^2) on tau

Frequentist check (netmeta)

Method
inverse variance, REML, MD
Tau
3.658
I squared
89%
Q (total)
35.10 on 4 df, P = 0.000
Q (between designs)
0.00

Inconsistency

Do trials comparing two treatments directly agree with the indirect evidence through other treatments?

No comparison here has both direct and indirect evidence, so inconsistency cannot be checked by node splitting; the between designs Q above is the global check.

Small study effects

A comparison adjusted funnel plot: each point is one trial comparison, centered on its own network estimate. Asymmetry can signal that small trials with unfavorable results are missing.

Fewer than ten trial comparisons, too few to judge funnel plot asymmetry.

Baseline characteristics of the trials

The baseline value of each effect modifier or prognostic factor that applies here, per trial: mean or percent over arms, weighted by the number randomized. A note under a value names a stand in (a median for a mean, 100 minus the male share, Asian subgroup rows, an all Asian site list); "not reported" means no source of the trial prints it.
Baseline effect modifiers and prognostic factors per trial
TrialBaseline BMI or body weight (kg/m2)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 13 of 13
Type 2 diabetes share in weight trials (percent of participants)
effect modifier; 13 of 13
Sex (percent female)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 13 of 13
Asian ancestry or region (percent Asian)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 9 of 13
Treatment duration (weeks)
effect modifier; 13 of 13
Lifestyle co-intervention intensity (none standard intensive)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 13 of 13
BARI-STEP
S000434
41.51082.852.8568standard
BARIOPTIMISE
S000466
43.113747.1424standard
NCT00500370
S000663
39.510
population codes
76.69not reported24intensive
NCT02075281
S000743
35.440
population codes
76.358.4920standard
NCT04904913
S001183
31.830
population codes
52.0310024none
Dapalost
S001235
35.40
population codes
61.25not reported24standard
STABLE Wt Loss
S001294
37.480
population codes
78.364.260not_reported;standard
NCT05623839
S001559
32.50
population codes
50not reported20none
STRIVE
S001687
45.9635.564.283.56104intensive
NCT01557166
S002315
39.150
population codes
28.14.4632standard
NCT05051579
S002337
38.080
population codes
59.190.7436standard
NCT06256562
S002790
33.230
population codes
45.6210030standard
S003017
S003017
38.050
population codes
87.5not reported52.14standard

Comparability of the trials

Checked across designs (the set of treatments each trial compares) for eligibility, outcome definition and assessment, and the baseline factors above. Flags point to possible intransitivity; notes describe variation that is not tied to design.
  • FlagBaseline, Baseline BMI or body weight: design means range from 32.2 (MAZD_SC vs PLACEBO) to 46.0 (LIRA_SC vs STANDARD_CARE) kg/m2; threshold 3
  • FlagBaseline, Type 2 diabetes share in weight trials: design means range from 0.0 (BOFANG_SC vs PLACEBO) to 35.5 (LIRA_SC vs STANDARD_CARE) percent of participants; threshold 20
  • FlagBaseline, Sex: design means range from 45.6 (BOFANG_SC vs PLACEBO) to 80.6 (PLACEBO vs SEMA_SC) percent female; threshold 15
  • FlagBaseline, Asian ancestry or region: not reported by 4 of 13 trials
  • FlagBaseline, Asian ancestry or region: design means range from 0.7 (ORFO_PO vs PLACEBO) to 100.0 (BOFANG_SC vs PLACEBO) percent Asian; threshold 30
  • FlagBaseline, Treatment duration: design means range from 20.0 (EFPE_SC vs PLACEBO) to 104.0 (LIRA_SC vs STANDARD_CARE) weeks; threshold 26
  • FlagHeterogeneity, tau above threshold: tau 3.50 exceeds the outcome threshold 2.5; the flags of this network are candidate explanations
  • NoteOutcome assessment, time point: selected time points span 20 to 32 weeks
  • NoteOutcome assessment, analysis set: mixed: completers 2, full_analysis 3, modified_itt 5, randomized 3
  • NoteRisk of bias, blinding: mixed: double_blind 12, open_label 1
  • NoteRisk of bias, funding: mixed: industry 11, mixed 2
  • NoteData handling, input conversions: arms_combined 5, n_randomized 12
Comparability items per trial
Trialtime weeksanalysis setdefinitioninstrumentadjudicatedproportion methodintercurrent events (discontinuation)intercurrent events (rescue)blindingfundingstart yearEligibility
BARI-STEP32randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindmixed2022age 18 to 65; at least 1 year after primary bypass or sleeve; less than 20 percent weight loss from surgery
BARIOPTIMISE24modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindmixed2018adults at least 1 year after RYGB or sleeve gastrectomy with 20 percent or less weight loss and suboptimal GLP-1 response
NCT0050037024modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2007adults with BMI 30 or more, without diabetes
NCT0207528120full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2014age 18 to 64 years; BMI 30 to 42, or 27 to 30 with comorbidity; FPG below 7 mmol/L; HbA1c 6.5 percent or less; no diabetes
NCT0490491324modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2021Chinese adults 18 to 75; BMI 28 or more, or 24 or more with comorbidity or hyperphagia; no diabetes, HbA1c below 6.5
Dapalost24full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2014age 18 to 70; BMI 30 to 45 kg/m2; no diabetes
STABLE Wt Loss20randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2022age 18 to 70; BMI 30 or more, or 27 or more with comorbidity; no diabetes; HbA1c 6.5 percent or less
NCT0562383927completersnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2022age 18 to 70; BMI 27 to 50; HbA1c below 6.5 percent; no diabetes
STRIVE32completersnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2017age 18 to 75; BMI 35 or more plus prediabetes, T2D, hypertension or sleep apnea; no insulin or GLP-1 RA
NCT0155716632full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2012age 18 to 64; BMI 30 or more; AHI 15 or more; no diabetes; unable or unwilling to use CPAP
NCT0505157926modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2021adults BMI 30 or more, or 27 to 30 with a weight related complication, without diabetes
NCT0625656230modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2023age 18 to 75; BMI 24 to <28 kg/m2 with comorbidity or 28 or more (Chinese criteria); no diabetes
S00301726.07randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2019age 20 to 65; BMI above 35; 12 to 36 months after bariatric surgery with suboptimal stable weight loss or regain

Trial data

What each trial contributes. Arm rows give the arm value with its standard error, or events over participants; contrast rows give the mean difference on the analysis scale against the trial's first row. Flags mark converted, combined or approximated inputs.
Trial data entering this analysis
TrialArmTreatmentWeekDataValueSEEvents / NFlagsSource
BARI-STEPA1PLACEBO32arm, percent_change0.7101.33030R0014003:Supplement Table 6
BARI-STEPA2SEMA_SC32arm, percent_change-12.9601.34034R0014003:Supplement Table 6
BARIOPTIMISEA1PLACEBO24arm, percent_change-0.5400.65126R0017334:Results
BARIOPTIMISEA2LIRA_SC24arm, percent_change-8.8200.88731R0017334:Results
NCT00500370A1EXEN_SC24contrast, md-3.3000.500R0026955:Results
NCT00500370A2PLACEBO24contrast, mdR0026955:Results
NCT02075281A1PLACEBO20arm, percent_change0.1000.60060n_randomizedR0011218:Table 2
NCT02075281A2+A3+A4+A5EFPE_SC20arm, percent_change-7.0270.299237n_randomized;arms_combinedR0011218:Table 2
NCT04904913A1+A2+A3MAZD_SC24arm, percent_change-9.4620.428186arms_combinedR0016107:Table 2
NCT04904913A4PLACEBO24arm, percent_change1.0000.70062R0016107:Table 2
DapalostA1EXENER_SC24arm, percent_change-4.4700.80425n_randomizedR0025627:Table 2
DapalostA2PLACEBO24arm, percent_change-0.2700.83925n_randomizedR0025627:Table 2
STABLE Wt LossA1SEMA_SC20arm, percent_change-9.7000.60072n_randomizedR0013679:Table 3
STABLE Wt LossA2PLACEBO20arm, percent_change-4.7000.90048n_randomizedR0013679:Table 3
NCT05623839A1PLACEBO27arm, percent_change1.2001.6006R0013210:Results
NCT05623839A2+A3MAZD_SC27arm, percent_change-14.1000.86021arms_combinedR0013210:Results
STRIVEA1STANDARD_CARE32arm, percent_change-4.5800.64679registry:outcomes
STRIVEA2LIRA_SC32arm, percent_change-9.0000.404208registry:outcomes
NCT01557166A1LIRA_SC32arm, percent_change-5.7000.400180n_randomizedR0026203:Results
NCT01557166A2PLACEBO32arm, percent_change-1.6000.300179n_randomizedR0026203:Results
NCT05051579A1+A2+A3+A5ORFO_PO26arm, percent_change-11.3300.408208arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
NCT05051579A7PLACEBO26arm, percent_change-2.0000.81048registry:outcomes
NCT06256562A1+A2+A3+A4+A5BOFANG_SC30arm, percent_change-14.0470.443274n_randomized;arms_combinedR0002409:Supplement Table S2
NCT06256562A6PLACEBO30arm, percent_change-0.9300.83066n_randomizedR0002409:Supplement Table S2
S003017A1LIRA_SC26.07arm, percent_change-3.4900.79024n_randomizedR0016758:Supplement eTable 1
S003017A2PLACEBO26.07arm, percent_change-0.1600.88024n_randomizedR0016758:Supplement eTable 1

Rerun this analysis yourself

Remove treatments or trials and refit the frequentist and Bayesian models in your browser, with the same methods as the published analysis.

Open in the NMA lab