LivingGLP1
Network meta-analysis

HbA1c below 7 percent

Type 2 diabetes (adults); background therapy: one or more non insulin glucose lowering drugs

weeks 20 to 36 (target week 26)Not stated by the trialsDoses of a drug pooledOdds ratio
17
Randomized trials
17
Treatments
9,405
Participants
4,646
Events

In plain language

Across 17 trials with 9,405 participants, 13 of 16 treatments had a clearly better result than placebo on HbA1c below 7 percent, and for 3 the evidence could not tell them apart from placebo. The most favorable estimate was for Semaglutide injection: odds ratio 16.78 (95% credible interval 8.14 to 32.12).

Higher values favor the treatment. "Clearly" means the 95% credible interval excludes no difference. These are averages across trials; they do not say how any one person will respond. Not medical advice.

Network of trials

Each circle is a treatment; each line joins treatments that were randomized against each other in at least one trial.
COTA_SCDAPAEXEN_SCDAPAGLIFLOZINDULA_SCEXENER_SCEXEN_SCGLIMEPIRIDEIDEGLIRA_SCIGLARLIXI_SCINS_GLARGINELIRA_SCLIXI_SCPEGLOX_SCPLACEBOSEMA_SCSITAGLIPTINVISEPE_SC
Node area shows participants; line width shows trials comparing two treatments directly. Blue: GLP-1 receptor agonist containing treatments; grey: comparators. Hover over or tab to a node or line for details.

Effects compared with Placebo

Odds ratio. Higher values favor the treatment.
0.250.51245102050← favors referencefavors treatment →Semaglutide injectionInsulin degludec with liraglutid…Insulin glargine with lixisenati…Dulaglutide injectionInsulin glargineExenatide extended release and d…Polyethylene glycol loxenatide i…Cotadutide injectionGlimepirideLiraglutide injectionVisepegenatide injectionExenatide injectionExenatide extended release injec…SitagliptinLixisenatide injectionDapagliflozin
Versus Placebo, log scale. Blue: Bayesian random effects posterior median with 95% credible interval (thick) and 95% prediction interval (dashed). Amber diamond: frequentist estimate with 95% confidence interval. Hover over or tab to a row for its values.
Effects of each treatment versus Placebo
TreatmentBayesian OR (95% CrI)95% prediction intervalFrequentist OR (95% CI)Verdict
Semaglutide injection
SEMA_SC
16.78 (8.14 to 32.12)5.77 to 41.0218.91 (11.46 to 31.23)Better
Insulin degludec with liraglutide injection
IDEGLIRA_SC
16.43 (4.86 to 40.82)3.79 to 49.8119.32 (10.35 to 36.06)Better
Insulin glargine with lixisenatide injection
IGLARLIXI_SC
10.95 (4.20 to 23.48)3.27 to 29.9612.43 (7.36 to 21.00)Better
Dulaglutide injection
DULA_SC
8.08 (3.58 to 17.15)2.71 to 21.708.40 (5.09 to 13.86)Better
Insulin glargine
INS_GLARGINE
5.85 (2.47 to 11.44)1.93 to 14.866.60 (4.01 to 10.87)Better
Exenatide extended release and dapagliflozin injection
DAPAEXEN_SC
5.15 (1.31 to 14.21)1.08 to 16.616.48 (3.03 to 13.85)Better
Polyethylene glycol loxenatide injection
PEGLOX_SC
4.51 (1.51 to 13.27)1.27 to 16.094.68 (1.89 to 11.57)Better
Cotadutide injection
COTA_SC
3.99 (1.76 to 9.08)1.39 to 11.214.07 (2.38 to 6.96)Better
Glimepiride
GLIMEPIRIDE
3.78 (1.63 to 7.88)1.26 to 9.884.25 (2.42 to 7.46)Better
Liraglutide injection
LIRA_SC
3.42 (1.70 to 5.95)1.20 to 7.824.00 (2.49 to 6.41)Better
Visepegenatide injection
VISEPE_SC
3.03 (1.38 to 6.42)1.03 to 8.433.07 (1.94 to 4.85)Better
Exenatide injection
EXEN_SC
2.47 (1.18 to 5.57)0.93 to 7.232.32 (1.24 to 4.32)Better
Exenatide extended release injection
EXENER_SC
2.42 (0.82 to 5.33)0.65 to 6.532.94 (1.62 to 5.35)Unclear
Sitagliptin
SITAGLIPTIN
2.19 (0.79 to 5.42)0.62 to 6.442.58 (1.35 to 4.96)Unclear
Lixisenatide injection
LIXI_SC
2.02 (1.17 to 3.26)0.84 to 4.562.13 (1.52 to 2.98)Better
Dapagliflozin
DAPAGLIFLOZIN
1.51 (0.40 to 4.30)0.32 to 5.021.89 (0.86 to 4.15)Unclear

Ranking

How likely each treatment is to be among the best. Rankings ignore the size of differences and their certainty, so read them with the effects above.

League table

Every treatment against every other: odds ratio of the row treatment versus the column treatment, posterior median and 95% credible interval. Green: row clearly better; red: row clearly worse.
Every treatment in a row compared with every treatment in a column
Row versus columnPLACEBOSEMA_SCIDEGLIRA_SCIGLARLIXI_SCDULA_SCINS_GLARGINEDAPAEXEN_SCPEGLOX_SCCOTA_SCGLIMEPIRIDELIRA_SCVISEPE_SCEXEN_SCEXENER_SCSITAGLIPTINLIXI_SCDAPAGLIFLOZIN
PLACEBOPLACEBO0.06
0.03 to 0.12
0.06
0.02 to 0.21
0.09
0.04 to 0.24
0.12
0.06 to 0.28
0.17
0.09 to 0.41
0.19
0.07 to 0.76
0.22
0.08 to 0.66
0.25
0.11 to 0.57
0.26
0.13 to 0.61
0.29
0.17 to 0.59
0.33
0.16 to 0.72
0.41
0.18 to 0.85
0.41
0.19 to 1.22
0.46
0.18 to 1.26
0.50
0.31 to 0.86
0.66
0.23 to 2.48
SEMA_SC16.78
8.14 to 32.12
SEMA_SC1.03
0.34 to 3.60
1.53
0.55 to 4.38
2.09
0.72 to 5.56
2.90
1.15 to 7.65
3.28
1.15 to 11.58
3.73
0.98 to 12.68
4.22
1.36 to 11.64
4.45
1.84 to 10.58
4.91
2.66 to 9.61
5.60
1.84 to 14.53
6.84
2.21 to 17.96
6.95
3.01 to 18.94
7.69
2.89 to 21.04
8.36
3.53 to 18.31
11.09
3.75 to 38.95
IDEGLIRA_SC16.43
4.86 to 40.82
0.97
0.28 to 2.93
IDEGLIRA_SC1.49
0.52 to 3.92
2.02
0.49 to 6.81
2.81
1.29 to 5.55
3.16
0.77 to 13.95
3.56
0.73 to 14.45
4.06
0.97 to 13.15
4.34
1.14 to 13.25
4.73
1.49 to 13.49
5.42
1.29 to 17.08
6.67
1.46 to 20.59
6.75
1.86 to 24.46
7.47
1.90 to 25.94
8.15
2.65 to 19.61
10.81
2.58 to 47.84
IGLARLIXI_SC10.95
4.20 to 23.48
0.65
0.23 to 1.81
0.67
0.25 to 1.93
IGLARLIXI_SC1.35
0.40 to 4.02
1.88
0.91 to 3.83
2.10
0.61 to 9.15
2.41
0.57 to 8.96
2.74
0.74 to 7.93
2.90
0.95 to 8.17
3.19
1.19 to 8.36
3.64
1.08 to 10.45
4.46
1.20 to 12.92
4.53
1.48 to 15.38
4.98
1.52 to 16.41
5.43
2.40 to 10.71
7.24
1.98 to 29.74
DULA_SC8.08
3.58 to 17.15
0.48
0.18 to 1.39
0.50
0.15 to 2.02
0.74
0.25 to 2.52
DULA_SC1.39
0.49 to 4.40
1.56
0.46 to 7.30
1.80
0.48 to 6.53
2.02
0.62 to 6.39
2.15
0.73 to 6.35
2.36
0.92 to 6.70
2.68
0.87 to 7.72
3.29
1.03 to 9.20
3.34
1.14 to 12.03
3.69
1.12 to 13.13
3.99
1.54 to 9.96
5.33
1.49 to 24.19
INS_GLARGINE5.85
2.47 to 11.44
0.34
0.13 to 0.87
0.36
0.18 to 0.77
0.53
0.26 to 1.10
0.72
0.23 to 2.06
INS_GLARGINE1.13
0.34 to 4.35
1.28
0.34 to 4.48
1.44
0.44 to 4.05
1.54
0.54 to 3.96
1.70
0.73 to 3.95
1.92
0.58 to 5.22
2.37
0.70 to 6.41
2.41
0.87 to 7.36
2.66
0.86 to 8.00
2.88
1.36 to 5.28
3.85
1.10 to 14.60
DAPAEXEN_SC5.15
1.31 to 14.21
0.30
0.09 to 0.87
0.32
0.07 to 1.30
0.48
0.11 to 1.65
0.64
0.14 to 2.16
0.89
0.23 to 2.92
DAPAEXEN_SC1.14
0.21 to 4.83
1.27
0.26 to 4.59
1.37
0.36 to 3.98
1.51
0.51 to 3.74
1.70
0.36 to 5.77
2.09
0.41 to 7.16
2.13
0.95 to 4.34
2.35
0.60 to 7.64
2.56
0.63 to 7.58
3.39
1.52 to 7.34
PEGLOX_SC4.51
1.51 to 13.27
0.27
0.08 to 1.02
0.28
0.07 to 1.37
0.41
0.11 to 1.75
0.56
0.15 to 2.07
0.78
0.22 to 2.96
0.88
0.21 to 4.67
PEGLOX_SC1.12
0.30 to 4.21
1.19
0.34 to 4.56
1.33
0.41 to 4.62
1.49
0.40 to 5.44
1.84
0.48 to 6.73
1.88
0.51 to 8.54
2.06
0.52 to 9.37
2.25
0.70 to 7.65
3.02
0.69 to 16.62
COTA_SC3.99
1.76 to 9.08
0.24
0.09 to 0.74
0.25
0.08 to 1.03
0.36
0.13 to 1.35
0.49
0.16 to 1.60
0.69
0.25 to 2.26
0.79
0.22 to 3.79
0.89
0.24 to 3.36
COTA_SC1.06
0.36 to 3.40
1.17
0.45 to 3.57
1.32
0.43 to 4.05
1.65
0.50 to 4.74
1.65
0.54 to 6.61
1.84
0.56 to 6.83
1.97
0.78 to 5.30
2.66
0.71 to 12.92
GLIMEPIRIDE3.78
1.63 to 7.88
0.22
0.09 to 0.54
0.23
0.08 to 0.88
0.34
0.12 to 1.06
0.46
0.16 to 1.37
0.65
0.25 to 1.87
0.73
0.25 to 2.74
0.84
0.22 to 2.90
0.95
0.29 to 2.75
GLIMEPIRIDE1.10
0.58 to 2.29
1.25
0.40 to 3.59
1.54
0.47 to 4.34
1.56
0.67 to 4.45
1.72
0.66 to 4.82
1.87
0.75 to 4.51
2.52
0.83 to 9.39
LIRA_SC3.42
1.70 to 5.95
0.20
0.10 to 0.38
0.21
0.07 to 0.67
0.31
0.12 to 0.84
0.42
0.15 to 1.09
0.59
0.25 to 1.36
0.66
0.27 to 1.96
0.75
0.22 to 2.42
0.85
0.28 to 2.20
0.91
0.44 to 1.72
LIRA_SC1.14
0.38 to 2.76
1.39
0.45 to 3.48
1.42
0.76 to 2.97
1.56
0.73 to 3.31
1.71
0.74 to 3.47
2.28
0.86 to 6.65
VISEPE_SC3.03
1.38 to 6.42
0.18
0.07 to 0.54
0.18
0.06 to 0.78
0.27
0.10 to 0.93
0.37
0.13 to 1.15
0.52
0.19 to 1.73
0.59
0.17 to 2.79
0.67
0.18 to 2.51
0.76
0.25 to 2.31
0.80
0.28 to 2.49
0.88
0.36 to 2.61
VISEPE_SC1.23
0.40 to 3.41
1.25
0.43 to 4.90
1.38
0.45 to 5.16
1.50
0.62 to 3.86
2.00
0.56 to 9.21
EXEN_SC2.47
1.18 to 5.57
0.15
0.06 to 0.45
0.15
0.05 to 0.69
0.22
0.08 to 0.83
0.30
0.11 to 0.97
0.42
0.16 to 1.43
0.48
0.14 to 2.45
0.54
0.15 to 2.10
0.61
0.21 to 1.98
0.65
0.23 to 2.13
0.72
0.29 to 2.20
0.81
0.29 to 2.51
EXEN_SC1.02
0.34 to 4.04
1.12
0.35 to 4.33
1.22
0.52 to 3.33
1.63
0.47 to 7.77
EXENER_SC2.42
0.82 to 5.33
0.14
0.05 to 0.33
0.15
0.04 to 0.54
0.22
0.07 to 0.67
0.30
0.08 to 0.88
0.42
0.14 to 1.15
0.47
0.23 to 1.06
0.53
0.12 to 1.96
0.60
0.15 to 1.84
0.64
0.22 to 1.50
0.70
0.34 to 1.32
0.80
0.20 to 2.32
0.98
0.25 to 2.92
EXENER_SC1.10
0.37 to 2.85
1.20
0.38 to 2.95
1.60
0.72 to 3.60
SITAGLIPTIN2.19
0.79 to 5.42
0.13
0.05 to 0.35
0.13
0.04 to 0.53
0.20
0.06 to 0.66
0.27
0.08 to 0.90
0.38
0.12 to 1.16
0.43
0.13 to 1.67
0.49
0.11 to 1.94
0.54
0.15 to 1.80
0.58
0.21 to 1.52
0.64
0.30 to 1.37
0.72
0.19 to 2.24
0.89
0.23 to 2.84
0.91
0.35 to 2.69
SITAGLIPTIN1.09
0.36 to 3.04
1.45
0.42 to 5.67
LIXI_SC2.02
1.17 to 3.26
0.12
0.05 to 0.28
0.12
0.05 to 0.38
0.18
0.09 to 0.42
0.25
0.10 to 0.65
0.35
0.19 to 0.74
0.39
0.13 to 1.58
0.44
0.13 to 1.43
0.51
0.19 to 1.27
0.54
0.22 to 1.33
0.58
0.29 to 1.34
0.67
0.26 to 1.63
0.82
0.30 to 1.92
0.83
0.34 to 2.62
0.92
0.33 to 2.75
LIXI_SC1.34
0.43 to 5.16
DAPAGLIFLOZIN1.51
0.40 to 4.30
0.09
0.03 to 0.27
0.09
0.02 to 0.39
0.14
0.03 to 0.51
0.19
0.04 to 0.67
0.26
0.07 to 0.91
0.29
0.14 to 0.66
0.33
0.06 to 1.45
0.38
0.08 to 1.41
0.40
0.11 to 1.20
0.44
0.15 to 1.16
0.50
0.11 to 1.77
0.61
0.13 to 2.13
0.62
0.28 to 1.39
0.69
0.18 to 2.36
0.75
0.19 to 2.33
DAPAGLIFLOZIN

Heterogeneity, fit and convergence

Bayesian random effects (primary)

Heterogeneity (tau)
0.253 (95% CrI 0.066 to 0.694), log scale
Residual deviance
37.4 for 37 data points
DIC
72.0 (pD 34.6)
Largest R-hat
1.002
Smallest ESS
bulk 1,379, tail 1,997
Divergent transitions
0
Convergence
All criteria met
Priors
PR02 N(0, 5^2); PR05 N(0, 2.5^2); PR09 log normal(-2, 1.58^2) on tau^2 (Biological markers (dichotomised), pharm vs pharm)

Frequentist check (netmeta)

Method
inverse variance, REML, OR
Tau
0.130
I squared
28%
Q (total)
5.55 on 4 df, P = 0.236
Q (between designs)
0.61, P = 0.738

Inconsistency

Do trials comparing two treatments directly agree with the indirect evidence through other treatments?

No comparison here has both direct and indirect evidence, so inconsistency cannot be checked by node splitting; the between designs Q above is the global check.

Small study effects

A comparison adjusted funnel plot: each point is one trial comparison, centered on its own network estimate. Asymmetry can signal that small trials with unfavorable results are missing.

Fewer than ten trial comparisons, too few to judge funnel plot asymmetry.

Baseline characteristics of the trials

The baseline value of each effect modifier or prognostic factor that applies here, per trial: mean or percent over arms, weighted by the number randomized. A note under a value names a stand in (a median for a mean, 100 minus the male share, Asian subgroup rows, an all Asian site list); "not reported" means no source of the trial prints it.
Baseline effect modifiers and prognostic factors per trial
TrialBaseline HbA1c (percent)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 13 of 17
Background glucose lowering therapy (stratum S0 to S4)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 17 of 17
Diabetes duration (years)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 12 of 17
NCT01296412
S000080
8.15S17.9
NCT03235050
S000257
not reportedS1not reported
NCT01029886
S000352
8.45S18.49
SUSTAIN 9
S000483
8.05S19.7
SUSTAIN 10
S000584
8.2S19.3
NCT01149421
S000784
7.93S18.34
NCT02229396
S000791
9.3S17.37
DUAL™ VIII
S001131
not reportedS1not reported
GetGoal-M-Asia
S001185
7.9S16.64
NCT00701935
S001193
not reportedS1not reported
LixiLan-O
S001199
8.1S18.82
NCT04504396
S001230
8.47S15.14
LEAD-2
S001502
8.38S17.56
GETGOAL-F1
S001563
8.04S15.89
NCT00603239
S001737
not reportedS1not reported
S002928
S002928
7.3
median
S1not reported
S003006
S003006
8.25S112.45

Comparability of the trials

Checked across designs (the set of treatments each trial compares) for eligibility, outcome definition and assessment, and the baseline factors above. Flags point to possible intransitivity; notes describe variation that is not tied to design.
  • FlagBaseline, Baseline HbA1c: not reported by 4 of 17 trials
  • FlagBaseline, Baseline HbA1c: design means range from 7.3 (PEGLOX_SC vs PLACEBO) to 9.3 (DAPAEXEN_SC vs DAPAGLIFLOZIN vs EXENER_SC) percent; threshold 0.5
  • FlagBaseline, Diabetes duration: not reported by 5 of 17 trials
  • FlagBaseline, Diabetes duration: design means range from 5.1 (PLACEBO vs VISEPE_SC) to 12.4 (INS_GLARGINE vs LIRA_SC) years; threshold 3
  • FlagEligibility, bmi entry range: a design requires bmi 50 or more while another admits only 40 or less
  • NoteOutcome assessment, time point: selected time points span 24 to 30 weeks
  • NoteOutcome assessment, analysis set: mixed: completers 3, full_analysis 5, modified_itt 8, per_protocol 1
  • NoteOutcome assessment, definition: mixed: HbA1c 7 percent or less 1, HbA1c 7.0 percent or lower 1, HbA1c at or below 7 percent 1, HbA1c below 7 percent 1, HbA1c below 7 percent at week 24 1, HbA1c below 7 percent at week 28 1, not stated 11
  • NoteOutcome assessment, proportion method: mixed: not stated 5, not_stated 5, observed 7
  • NoteRisk of bias, blinding: mixed: double_blind 10, open_label 6, single_blind 1
  • NoteRisk of bias, funding: mixed: industry 15, non_industry 2
  • NoteData handling, input conversions: arms_combined 5, count_from_percent 24
Comparability items per trial
Trialtime weeksanalysis setdefinitioninstrumentadjudicatedproportion methodintercurrent events (discontinuation)intercurrent events (rescue)blindingfundingstart yearEligibility
NCT0129641226per_protocolnot statednot statednot statedobservednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2011age 18 to 79; HbA1c 7.0 to 11.0 percent on metformin 1500 mg or more; eGFR 60 or more
NCT0323505026full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2017age 18 or older; BMI 25 or higher; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; on metformin
NCT0102988626modified_ittHbA1c below 7 percentnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2010adults 18 or older with type 2 diabetes on oral agents, HbA1c 7.1 to 11.0 percent, BMI 45 or less
SUSTAIN 930full_analysisnot statednot statednot statedobservednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2017adults 18 or older (20 in Japan); HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; stable SGLT2i with or without metformin or SU
SUSTAIN 1030full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot_statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2017adults with T2D, HbA1c 7.0 to 11.0 percent on 1 to 3 oral drugs
NCT0114942126modified_ittnot statednot statednot statedobservednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2010adults 18 or older; HbA1c 7 to 9.5 percent; stable oral agents
NCT0222939628modified_ittHbA1c below 7 percent at week 28not statednot statednot_statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2014age 18 or older; HbA1c 8.0 to 12.0 percent on metformin 1500 mg/d or more
DUAL™ VIII26full_analysisnot statednot statednot statedobservednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2016adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral drugs, insulin naive
GetGoal-M-Asia24modified_ittHbA1c at or below 7 percentnot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2010Asian adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin with or without sulfonylurea
NCT0070193526.07completersHbA1c 7.0 percent or lowernot statednot statedobservednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2008adults with T2D on metformin
LixiLan-O30modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2014adults; HbA1c 7.5 to 10% on metformin or 7 to 9% on metformin plus second OAD; 7 to 10% after run in
NCT0450439624full_analysisnot statednot statednot statedobservednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2020age 18 to 75; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; BMI 40 or lower; eGFR 60 or higher; metformin monotherapy at least 1000 mg
LEAD-226modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot_statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2006age 18 to 80; HbA1c 7 to 11 percent on one OAD or 7 to 10 on combination; BMI 40 or less; no recent insulin
GETGOAL-F124modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2008adults with T2D on metformin
NCT0060323926modified_ittHbA1c 7 percent or lessnot statednot statednot_statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2008type 2 diabetes on a thiazolidinedione with or without metformin
S00292824completersHbA1c below 7 percent at week 24not statednot statednot_statednot statednot statedsingle_blindnon_industry2022age 18 to 65; BMI 50 or more; type 2 diabetes
S00300624completersnot statednot statednot statedobservednot statednot statedopen_labelnon_industry2013Japanese adults 20 or older; HbA1c 7.0 to below 10 on DPP-4 inhibitor based oral therapy

Trial data

What each trial contributes. Arm rows give the arm value with its standard error, or events over participants; contrast rows give the odds ratio on the analysis scale (log) against the trial's first row. Flags mark converted, combined or approximated inputs.
Trial data entering this analysis
TrialArmTreatmentWeekDataValueSEEvents / NFlagsSource
NCT01296412A1SITAGLIPTIN26arm, responders169 / 269count_from_percentR0026295:Results
NCT01296412A2LIRA_SC26arm, responders183 / 253count_from_percentR0026295:Results
NCT03235050A1PLACEBO26arm, responders25 / 112registry:outcomes
NCT03235050A3+A4+A5COTA_SC26arm, responders330 / 612arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
NCT01029886A1EXENER_SC26arm, responders243 / 461R0016299:Results
NCT01029886A2LIRA_SC26arm, responders271 / 450R0016299:Results
SUSTAIN 9A1SEMA_SC30arm, responders99 / 120count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 9A2PLACEBO30arm, responders26 / 127count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 10A1SEMA_SC30arm, responders233 / 290count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 10A2LIRA_SC30arm, responders132 / 287count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
NCT01149421A1+A2DULA_SC26arm, responders252 / 432count_from_percent;arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
NCT01149421A3PLACEBO26arm, responders30 / 210count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
NCT02229396A1DAPAEXEN_SC28arm, responders102 / 228count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
NCT02229396A2EXENER_SC28arm, responders61 / 227count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
NCT02229396A3DAPAGLIFLOZIN28arm, responders44 / 230count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
DUAL™ VIIIA1IDEGLIRA_SC26arm, responders398 / 506count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
DUAL™ VIIIA2INS_GLARGINE26arm, responders282 / 506count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
GetGoal-M-AsiaA1PLACEBO24arm, responders84 / 188R0021439:Table 5
GetGoal-M-AsiaA2LIXI_SC24arm, responders107 / 185R0021439:Table 5
NCT00701935A1EXEN_SC26.07arm, responders17 / 28count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
NCT00701935A2PLACEBO26.07arm, responders6 / 28count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
LixiLan-OA1IGLARLIXI_SC30arm, responders345 / 468R0013783:Supplement Table S2
LixiLan-OA2INS_GLARGINE30arm, responders277 / 466R0013783:Supplement Table S2
LixiLan-OA3LIXI_SC30arm, responders77 / 233R0013783:Supplement Table S2
NCT04504396A1VISEPE_SC24arm, responders115 / 310R0009432:Table 2
NCT04504396A2PLACEBO24arm, responders50 / 310R0009432:Table 2
LEAD-2A1+A2+A3LIRA_SC26arm, responders256 / 724count_from_percent;arms_combinedR0019848:Figure 1E
LEAD-2A4GLIMEPIRIDE26arm, responders88 / 242count_from_percentR0019848:Figure 1E
LEAD-2A5PLACEBO26arm, responders13 / 121count_from_percentR0019848:Figure 1E
GETGOAL-F1A1PLACEBO24arm, responders38 / 158R0021439:Supplement Table 2
GETGOAL-F1A2+A3LIXI_SC24arm, responders138 / 308arms_combinedR0021439:Supplement Table 2
NCT00603239A1EXEN_SC26arm, responders51 / 104count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
NCT00603239A2PLACEBO26arm, responders19 / 52count_from_percentregistry:outcomes
S002928A1PLACEBO24arm, responders14 / 35count_from_percentR0007034:Results
S002928A2+A3PEGLOX_SC24arm, responders53 / 70count_from_percent;arms_combinedR0007034:Results
S003006A1INS_GLARGINE24arm, responders11 / 26count_from_percentR0010916:Results
S003006A2LIRA_SC24arm, responders7 / 29count_from_percentR0010916:Results

Rerun this analysis yourself

Remove treatments or trials and refit the frequentist and Bayesian models in your browser, with the same methods as the published analysis.

Open in the NMA lab