LivingGLP1
Network meta-analysis

SF-36 physical component summary change

Type 2 diabetes (adults)

weeks 20 to 130 (target week 52)Not stated by the trialsDoses of a drug pooledMean difference
15
Randomized trials
10
Treatments
13,428
Participants
30
Trial arms

In plain language

Across 15 trials with 13,428 participants, 0 of 9 treatments had a clearly better result than placebo on SF-36 physical component summary change, and for 9 the evidence could not tell them apart from placebo. The most favorable estimate was for Canagliflozin: mean difference 1.34 points (95% credible interval -2.08 to 4.97).

Higher values favor the treatment. "Clearly" means the 95% credible interval excludes no difference. These are averages across trials; they do not say how any one person will respond. Not medical advice.

Network of trials

Each circle is a treatment; each line joins treatments that were randomized against each other in at least one trial.
CANAGLIFLOZINDULA_SCIDEGLIRA_SCINS_ASPARTINS_GLARGINELIRA_SCPLACEBOSEMA_POSEMA_SCSITAGLIPTIN
Node area shows participants; line width shows trials comparing two treatments directly. Blue: GLP-1 receptor agonist containing treatments; grey: comparators. Hover over or tab to a node or line for details.

Effects compared with Placebo

Mean difference in points. Higher values favor the treatment.
-4-20246← favors referencefavors treatment →CanagliflozinSemaglutide injectionDulaglutide injectionSemaglutide tabletLiraglutide injectionInsulin aspart (prandial)SitagliptinInsulin glargineInsulin degludec with liraglutid…
Versus Placebo. Blue: Bayesian random effects posterior median with 95% credible interval (thick) and 95% prediction interval (dashed). Amber diamond: frequentist estimate with 95% confidence interval. Hover over or tab to a row for its values.
Effects of each treatment versus Placebo
TreatmentBayesian MD (95% CrI)95% prediction intervalFrequentist MD (95% CI)Verdict
Canagliflozin
CANAGLIFLOZIN
1.34 (-2.08 to 4.97)-2.96 to 5.881.31 (-1.30 to 3.92)Unclear
Semaglutide injection
SEMA_SC
1.12 (-0.93 to 3.40)-2.19 to 4.741.11 (-0.49 to 2.71)Unclear
Dulaglutide injection
DULA_SC
1.09 (-2.37 to 4.74)-3.26 to 5.651.10 (-1.47 to 3.67)Unclear
Semaglutide tablet
SEMA_PO
0.71 (-0.88 to 2.36)-2.34 to 3.890.71 (-0.55 to 1.97)Unclear
Liraglutide injection
LIRA_SC
0.41 (-1.78 to 2.76)-3.01 to 4.020.39 (-1.34 to 2.12)Unclear
Insulin aspart (prandial)
INS_ASPART
0.21 (-2.34 to 3.06)-3.53 to 4.170.20 (-1.83 to 2.23)Unclear
Sitagliptin
SITAGLIPTIN
-0.14 (-3.26 to 3.10)-4.13 to 4.06-0.16 (-2.57 to 2.26)Unclear
Insulin glargine
INS_GLARGINE
-0.49 (-3.34 to 2.60)-4.48 to 3.59-0.55 (-2.74 to 1.64)Unclear
Insulin degludec with liraglutide injection
IDEGLIRA_SC
-0.58 (-4.23 to 2.85)-5.19 to 3.73-0.68 (-3.40 to 2.03)Unclear

Ranking

How likely each treatment is to be among the best. Rankings ignore the size of differences and their certainty, so read them with the effects above.

League table

Every treatment against every other: mean difference of the row treatment versus the column treatment, posterior median and 95% credible interval. Green: row clearly better; red: row clearly worse.
Every treatment in a row compared with every treatment in a column
Row versus columnPLACEBOCANAGLIFLOZINSEMA_SCDULA_SCSEMA_POLIRA_SCINS_ASPARTSITAGLIPTININS_GLARGINEIDEGLIRA_SC
PLACEBOPLACEBO-1.34
-4.97 to 2.08
-1.12
-3.40 to 0.93
-1.09
-4.74 to 2.37
-0.71
-2.36 to 0.88
-0.41
-2.76 to 1.78
-0.21
-3.06 to 2.34
0.14
-3.10 to 3.26
0.49
-2.60 to 3.34
0.58
-2.85 to 4.23
CANAGLIFLOZIN1.34
-2.08 to 4.97
CANAGLIFLOZIN0.21
-2.59 to 3.10
0.25
-3.72 to 4.19
0.65
-3.19 to 4.62
0.91
-2.49 to 4.43
1.12
-2.37 to 4.63
1.52
-3.28 to 6.30
1.84
-1.59 to 5.34
1.92
-1.95 to 6.19
SEMA_SC1.12
-0.93 to 3.40
-0.21
-3.10 to 2.59
SEMA_SC0.03
-2.80 to 2.81
0.44
-2.25 to 3.18
0.73
-1.31 to 2.69
0.91
-1.27 to 3.09
1.29
-2.69 to 5.08
1.62
-0.36 to 3.70
1.70
-0.96 to 4.77
DULA_SC1.09
-2.37 to 4.74
-0.25
-4.19 to 3.72
-0.03
-2.81 to 2.80
DULA_SC0.38
-3.50 to 4.29
0.70
-2.84 to 4.20
0.90
-2.64 to 4.48
1.27
-3.51 to 6.03
1.57
-1.73 to 5.19
1.67
-2.10 to 5.80
SEMA_PO0.71
-0.88 to 2.36
-0.65
-4.62 to 3.19
-0.44
-3.18 to 2.25
-0.38
-4.29 to 3.50
SEMA_PO0.29
-2.55 to 3.10
0.49
-2.78 to 3.63
0.86
-1.93 to 3.56
1.19
-2.16 to 4.52
1.27
-2.41 to 5.29
LIRA_SC0.41
-1.78 to 2.76
-0.91
-4.43 to 2.49
-0.73
-2.69 to 1.31
-0.70
-4.20 to 2.84
-0.29
-3.10 to 2.55
LIRA_SC0.19
-1.95 to 2.34
0.57
-3.50 to 4.35
0.89
-1.96 to 3.73
0.99
-2.41 to 4.65
INS_ASPART0.21
-2.34 to 3.06
-1.12
-4.63 to 2.37
-0.91
-3.09 to 1.27
-0.90
-4.48 to 2.64
-0.49
-3.63 to 2.78
-0.19
-2.34 to 1.95
INS_ASPART0.38
-3.86 to 4.57
0.71
-2.25 to 3.72
0.79
-2.53 to 4.63
SITAGLIPTIN-0.14
-3.26 to 3.10
-1.52
-6.30 to 3.28
-1.29
-5.08 to 2.69
-1.27
-6.03 to 3.51
-0.86
-3.56 to 1.93
-0.57
-4.35 to 3.50
-0.38
-4.57 to 3.86
SITAGLIPTIN0.33
-3.83 to 4.69
0.41
-4.19 to 5.51
INS_GLARGINE-0.49
-3.34 to 2.60
-1.84
-5.34 to 1.59
-1.62
-3.70 to 0.36
-1.57
-5.19 to 1.73
-1.19
-4.52 to 2.16
-0.89
-3.73 to 1.96
-0.71
-3.72 to 2.25
-0.33
-4.69 to 3.83
INS_GLARGINE0.09
-1.88 to 2.28
IDEGLIRA_SC-0.58
-4.23 to 2.85
-1.92
-6.19 to 1.95
-1.70
-4.77 to 0.96
-1.67
-5.80 to 2.10
-1.27
-5.29 to 2.41
-0.99
-4.65 to 2.41
-0.79
-4.63 to 2.53
-0.41
-5.51 to 4.19
-0.09
-2.28 to 1.88
IDEGLIRA_SC

Heterogeneity, fit and convergence

Bayesian random effects (primary)

Heterogeneity (tau)
1.088 (95% CrI 0.404 to 2.514)
Residual deviance
30.9 for 30 data points
DIC
60.1 (pD 29.2)
Largest R-hat
1.001
Smallest ESS
bulk 1,594, tail 2,534
Divergent transitions
0
Convergence
All criteria met
Priors
PR01 N(0, 40^2); PR03 N(0, 20^2); PR07 half normal(0, 4^2) on tau

Frequentist check (netmeta)

Method
inverse variance, REML, MD
Tau
0.944
I squared
73%
Q (total)
22.38 on 6 df, P = 0.001
Q (between designs)
0.20, P = 0.905

Inconsistency

Do trials comparing two treatments directly agree with the indirect evidence through other treatments?

No comparison here has both direct and indirect evidence, so inconsistency cannot be checked by node splitting; the between designs Q above is the global check.

Small study effects

A comparison adjusted funnel plot: each point is one trial comparison, centered on its own network estimate. Asymmetry can signal that small trials with unfavorable results are missing.

Fewer than ten trial comparisons, too few to judge funnel plot asymmetry.

Comparability of the trials

Checked across designs (the set of treatments each trial compares) for eligibility, outcome definition and assessment, and the baseline factors above. Flags point to possible intransitivity; notes describe variation that is not tied to design.
  • FlagEligibility, hba1c entry range: a design requires hba1c 10 or more while another admits only 9.5 or less
  • NoteOutcome assessment, time point: selected time points span 26 to 104 weeks
  • NoteOutcome assessment, analysis set: mixed: completers 1, full_analysis 13, randomized 1
  • NoteOutcome assessment, definition: mixed: not stated 14, overall physical summary norm based score 1
  • NoteOutcome assessment, instrument: mixed: not stated 14, SF-36v2 1
  • NoteOutcome assessment, intercurrent events (discontinuation): mixed: hypothetical 2, not stated 13
  • NoteOutcome assessment, intercurrent events (rescue): mixed: hypothetical 2, not stated 13
  • NoteRisk of bias, blinding: mixed: double_blind 6, open_label 9
  • NoteData handling, input conversions: arms_combined 9, median_converted 2
Comparability items per trial
Trialtime weeksanalysis setdefinitioninstrumentadjudicatedproportion methodintercurrent events (discontinuation)intercurrent events (rescue)blindingfundingstart yearEligibility
SCALE™ Insulin56full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2017age 18 or older; BMI 27 or higher; HbA1c 6.0 to 10 percent; basal insulin plus up to 2 oral drugs
SUSTAIN 1152full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2018adults; HbA1c above 7.5 to 10.0 percent on insulin glargine plus metformin
SUSTAIN 740full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2016age 18 or older; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; eGFR 60 or higher; metformin background
SUSTAIN 1030full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2017adults with T2D, HbA1c 7.0 to 11.0 percent on 1 to 3 oral drugs
DUAL™ VIII26full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2016adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral drugs, insulin naive
PIONEER 752randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2016age 18 or more; HbA1c 7.5 to 9.5 percent; one or two oral glucose lowering drugs
NCT0551453540full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2022adults with T2D, BMI 25 or more, HbA1c 7 to 10 percent, basal insulin up to 40 U/day plus metformin with or without SGLT2i
SUSTAIN™ 430full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2014adults with T2D, insulin naive, on metformin with or without SU; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.0 percent
DUALTM IX26full_analysisoverall physical summary norm based scoreSF-36v2not statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2016adults; insulin naive type 2 diabetes on SGLT2 inhibitor with or without other oral drugs; HbA1c 7.0 to 11.0 percent; BMI 20 to 40
PIONEER 126full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2016adults with type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise only; HbA1c 7.0 to 9.5 percent
SUSTAIN 852full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2017age 18 or older; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; eGFR 60 or higher; metformin 1500 mg or maximum tolerated
SUSTAIN™ 6104full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2013T2D HbA1c 7.0 or more; age 50 or more with CVD, CHF or CKD stage 3 or more, or age 60 or more with CV risk factor
PIONEER 526full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2016type 2 diabetes; HbA1c 7.0 to 9.5 percent; moderate renal impairment
SIMPLE26completersnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedopen_labelindustry2014age 18 or older; HbA1c 10 or higher; no prandial insulin, DPP-4 inhibitor or GLP-1 RA
PIONEER 852full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2017adults with type 2 diabetes on basal, premixed or basal bolus insulin with or without metformin

Trial data

What each trial contributes. Arm rows give the arm value with its standard error, or events over participants; contrast rows give the mean difference on the analysis scale against the trial's first row. Flags mark converted, combined or approximated inputs.
Trial data entering this analysis
TrialArmTreatmentWeekDataValueSEEvents / NFlagsSource
SCALE™ InsulinA1LIRA_SC56arm, change2.7000.533198registry:outcomes
SCALE™ InsulinA2PLACEBO56arm, change2.2000.512198registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 11A1SEMA_SC52arm, change1.4000.226803registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 11A2INS_ASPART52arm, change0.4000.238794registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 7A1+A2SEMA_SC40arm, change1.6240.283601arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 7A3+A4DULA_SC40arm, change1.6100.276598arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 10A1SEMA_SC30arm, change2.1000.376290registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 10A2LIRA_SC30arm, change1.4000.348287registry:outcomes
DUAL™ VIIIA1IDEGLIRA_SC26arm, change1.6000.280506registry:outcomes
DUAL™ VIIIA2INS_GLARGINE26arm, change0.9000.280506registry:outcomes
PIONEER 7A1+A3SEMA_PO52arm, change1.2820.339346arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
PIONEER 7A2+A4SITAGLIPTIN52arm, change0.4140.306348arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
NCT05514535A1SEMA_SC40arm, change3.1800.440288registry:outcomes
NCT05514535A2INS_GLARGINE40arm, change0.1200.395285registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN™ 4A1+A2SEMA_SC30arm, change1.6340.255722arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
SUSTAIN™ 4A3INS_GLARGINE30arm, change1.1800.340360registry:outcomes
DUALTM IXA1IDEGLIRA_SC26arm, final48.3250.709210median_convertedregistry:outcomes
DUALTM IXA2INS_GLARGINE26arm, final49.9500.700210median_convertedregistry:outcomes
PIONEER 1A1+A2+A3SEMA_PO26arm, change0.6710.267481arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
PIONEER 1A4PLACEBO26arm, change0.6500.421167registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 8A1SEMA_SC52arm, change2.7000.338394registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 8A2CANAGLIFLOZIN52arm, change2.9000.312394registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN™ 6A1+A2SEMA_SC104arm, change1.2490.1981,648arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
SUSTAIN™ 6A3+A4PLACEBO104arm, change0.2100.1981,649arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
PIONEER 5A1SEMA_PO26arm, change1.7800.561163registry:outcomes
PIONEER 5A2PLACEBO26arm, change-0.1500.481161registry:outcomes
SIMPLEA1INS_ASPART26arm, change-0.1000.15344registry:outcomes
SIMPLEA2LIRA_SC26arm, change0.0070.15346registry:outcomes
PIONEER 8A1+A2+A3SEMA_PO52arm, change0.0080.272547arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
PIONEER 8A4PLACEBO52arm, change-0.4100.482184registry:outcomes

Rerun this analysis yourself

Remove treatments or trials and refit the frequentist and Bayesian models in your browser, with the same methods as the published analysis.

Open in the NMA lab