LivingGLP1
Network meta-analysis

Systolic blood pressure change

Type 2 diabetes (adults)

weeks 20 to 36 (target week 26)Hypothetical (as if everyone stayed on treatment)Doses of a drug pooledMean difference
12
Randomized trials
12
Treatments
3,477
Participants
27
Trial arms

In plain language

Across 12 trials with 3,477 participants, 4 of 11 treatments had a clearly better result than placebo on systolic blood pressure change, and for 7 the evidence could not tell them apart from placebo. The most favorable estimate was for Retatrutide injection: mean difference -7.35 mmHg (95% credible interval -12.44 to -2.20).

Lower values favor the treatment. "Clearly" means the 95% credible interval excludes no difference. These are averages across trials; they do not say how any one person will respond. Not medical advice.

Network of trials

Each circle is a treatment; each line joins treatments that were randomized against each other in at least one trial.
DAPAEXEN_SCDAPAGLIFLOZINDULA_SCEXENER_SCLIRA_SCORFO_POPLACEBORETA_SCSAFIGL_POSEMA_POSEMA_SCSITAGLIPTIN
Node area shows participants; line width shows trials comparing two treatments directly. Blue: GLP-1 receptor agonist containing treatments; grey: comparators. Hover over or tab to a node or line for details.

Effects compared with Placebo

Mean difference in mmHg. Lower values favor the treatment.
-12.5-10-7.5-5-2.502.5← favors treatmentfavors reference →Retatrutide injectionSemaglutide injectionExenatide extended release and d…Liraglutide injectionSemaglutide tabletDapagliflozinSitagliptinOrforglipron tabletSafiglipron (HRS-7535) tabletExenatide extended release injec…Dulaglutide injection
Versus Placebo. Blue: Bayesian random effects posterior median with 95% credible interval (thick) and 95% prediction interval (dashed). Amber diamond: frequentist estimate with 95% confidence interval. Hover over or tab to a row for its values.
Effects of each treatment versus Placebo
TreatmentBayesian MD (95% CrI)95% prediction intervalFrequentist MD (95% CI)Verdict
Retatrutide injection
RETA_SC
-7.35 (-12.44 to -2.20)-12.94 to -1.70-7.50 (-12.01 to -2.98)Better
Semaglutide injection
SEMA_SC
-6.75 (-10.49 to -3.01)-11.22 to -2.02-6.76 (-9.74 to -3.79)Better
Exenatide extended release and dapagliflozin injection
DAPAEXEN_SC
-5.38 (-9.86 to -1.02)-10.58 to -0.26-5.37 (-8.31 to -2.43)Better
Liraglutide injection
LIRA_SC
-4.84 (-8.71 to -1.09)-9.50 to -0.24-4.82 (-7.97 to -1.66)Better
Semaglutide tablet
SEMA_PO
-4.74 (-10.81 to 1.16)-11.27 to 2.00-4.88 (-9.92 to 0.15)Unclear
Dapagliflozin
DAPAGLIFLOZIN
-2.96 (-6.83 to 0.71)-7.80 to 1.67-2.97 (-5.63 to -0.32)Unclear
Sitagliptin
SITAGLIPTIN
-2.69 (-6.59 to 1.32)-7.30 to 2.15-2.74 (-5.83 to 0.36)Unclear
Orforglipron tablet
ORFO_PO
-2.27 (-6.29 to 1.86)-7.00 to 2.72-2.28 (-5.56 to 0.99)Unclear
Safiglipron (HRS-7535) tablet
SAFIGL_PO
-2.21 (-5.98 to 1.48)-6.86 to 2.35-2.15 (-4.90 to 0.60)Unclear
Exenatide extended release injection
EXENER_SC
-2.16 (-5.41 to 1.05)-6.34 to 2.27-2.16 (-4.39 to 0.06)Unclear
Dulaglutide injection
DULA_SC
-1.81 (-5.74 to 2.17)-6.70 to 3.14-1.88 (-5.50 to 1.73)Unclear

Ranking

How likely each treatment is to be among the best. Rankings ignore the size of differences and their certainty, so read them with the effects above.

League table

Every treatment against every other: mean difference of the row treatment versus the column treatment, posterior median and 95% credible interval. Green: row clearly better; red: row clearly worse.
Every treatment in a row compared with every treatment in a column
Row versus columnPLACEBORETA_SCSEMA_SCDAPAEXEN_SCLIRA_SCSEMA_PODAPAGLIFLOZINSITAGLIPTINORFO_POSAFIGL_POEXENER_SCDULA_SC
PLACEBOPLACEBO7.35
2.20 to 12.44
6.75
3.01 to 10.49
5.38
1.02 to 9.86
4.84
1.09 to 8.71
4.74
-1.16 to 10.81
2.96
-0.71 to 6.83
2.69
-1.32 to 6.59
2.27
-1.86 to 6.29
2.21
-1.48 to 5.98
2.16
-1.05 to 5.41
1.81
-2.17 to 5.74
RETA_SC-7.35
-12.44 to -2.20
RETA_SC-0.62
-7.06 to 5.79
-1.95
-8.54 to 4.89
-2.51
-8.88 to 3.95
-2.60
-9.26 to 4.05
-4.36
-10.59 to 2.10
-4.61
-11.05 to 1.86
-5.11
-10.94 to 0.76
-5.13
-11.30 to 1.30
-5.20
-11.16 to 0.92
-5.55
-10.53 to -0.56
SEMA_SC-6.75
-10.49 to -3.01
0.62
-5.79 to 7.06
SEMA_SC-1.36
-7.04 to 4.54
-1.88
-5.37 to 1.82
-1.99
-8.80 to 5.09
-3.75
-8.98 to 1.65
-4.02
-6.42 to -1.59
-4.48
-9.97 to 1.01
-4.51
-9.70 to 0.87
-4.60
-9.57 to 0.35
-5.00
-10.35 to 0.65
DAPAEXEN_SC-5.38
-9.86 to -1.02
1.95
-4.89 to 8.54
1.36
-4.54 to 7.04
DAPAEXEN_SC-0.51
-6.47 to 5.26
-0.61
-7.86 to 6.51
-2.42
-5.82 to 1.01
-2.68
-8.83 to 3.17
-3.15
-9.10 to 2.66
-3.19
-7.42 to 1.18
-3.24
-6.64 to 0.14
-3.56
-9.55 to 2.17
LIRA_SC-4.84
-8.71 to -1.09
2.51
-3.95 to 8.88
1.88
-1.82 to 5.37
0.51
-5.26 to 6.47
LIRA_SC-0.08
-7.14 to 6.95
-1.86
-7.30 to 3.59
-2.14
-5.27 to 0.88
-2.60
-8.32 to 2.94
-2.64
-8.02 to 2.66
-2.70
-7.68 to 2.23
-3.02
-8.62 to 2.44
SEMA_PO-4.74
-10.81 to 1.16
2.60
-4.05 to 9.26
1.99
-5.09 to 8.80
0.61
-6.51 to 7.86
0.08
-6.95 to 7.14
SEMA_PO-1.79
-8.53 to 5.23
-2.06
-9.15 to 4.99
-2.53
-8.52 to 3.59
-2.56
-9.44 to 4.56
-2.61
-9.26 to 4.20
-2.96
-7.41 to 1.47
DAPAGLIFLOZIN-2.96
-6.83 to 0.71
4.36
-2.10 to 10.59
3.75
-1.65 to 8.98
2.42
-1.01 to 5.82
1.86
-3.59 to 7.30
1.79
-5.23 to 8.53
DAPAGLIFLOZIN-0.28
-5.86 to 5.09
-0.72
-6.38 to 4.54
-0.77
-3.53 to 2.32
-0.83
-4.04 to 2.31
-1.14
-6.76 to 4.17
SITAGLIPTIN-2.69
-6.59 to 1.32
4.61
-1.86 to 11.05
4.02
1.59 to 6.42
2.68
-3.17 to 8.83
2.14
-0.88 to 5.27
2.06
-4.99 to 9.15
0.28
-5.09 to 5.86
SITAGLIPTIN-0.49
-6.18 to 5.18
-0.52
-5.82 to 5.09
-0.55
-5.58 to 4.49
-0.92
-6.39 to 4.82
ORFO_PO-2.27
-6.29 to 1.86
5.11
-0.76 to 10.94
4.48
-1.01 to 9.97
3.15
-2.66 to 9.10
2.60
-2.94 to 8.32
2.53
-3.59 to 8.52
0.72
-4.54 to 6.38
0.49
-5.18 to 6.18
ORFO_PO-0.04
-5.38 to 5.56
-0.11
-5.20 to 5.15
-0.42
-4.51 to 3.63
SAFIGL_PO-2.21
-5.98 to 1.48
5.13
-1.30 to 11.30
4.51
-0.87 to 9.70
3.19
-1.18 to 7.42
2.64
-2.66 to 8.02
2.56
-4.56 to 9.44
0.77
-2.32 to 3.53
0.52
-5.09 to 5.82
0.04
-5.56 to 5.38
SAFIGL_PO-0.05
-3.97 to 3.71
-0.42
-5.78 to 4.91
EXENER_SC-2.16
-5.41 to 1.05
5.20
-0.92 to 11.16
4.60
-0.35 to 9.57
3.24
-0.14 to 6.64
2.70
-2.23 to 7.68
2.61
-4.20 to 9.26
0.83
-2.31 to 4.04
0.55
-4.49 to 5.58
0.11
-5.15 to 5.20
0.05
-3.71 to 3.97
EXENER_SC-0.35
-5.45 to 4.79
DULA_SC-1.81
-5.74 to 2.17
5.55
0.56 to 10.53
5.00
-0.65 to 10.35
3.56
-2.17 to 9.55
3.02
-2.44 to 8.62
2.96
-1.47 to 7.41
1.14
-4.17 to 6.76
0.92
-4.82 to 6.39
0.42
-3.63 to 4.51
0.42
-4.91 to 5.78
0.35
-4.79 to 5.45
DULA_SC

Heterogeneity, fit and convergence

Bayesian random effects (primary)

Heterogeneity (tau)
0.727 (95% CrI 0.035 to 3.568)
Residual deviance
20.2 for 23 data points
DIC
40.1 (pD 19.9)
Largest R-hat
1.002
Smallest ESS
bulk 1,684, tail 1,738
Divergent transitions
0
Convergence
All criteria met
Priors
PR01 N(0, 60^2); PR03 N(0, 30^2); PR07 half normal(0, 6^2) on tau

Frequentist check (netmeta)

Method
inverse variance, REML, MD
Tau
0.000
I squared
0%
Q (total)
0.47 on 4 df, P = 0.976
Q (between designs)
0.46, P = 0.928

Inconsistency

Do trials comparing two treatments directly agree with the indirect evidence through other treatments?

No comparison here has both direct and indirect evidence, so inconsistency cannot be checked by node splitting; the between designs Q above is the global check.

Small study effects

A comparison adjusted funnel plot: each point is one trial comparison, centered on its own network estimate. Asymmetry can signal that small trials with unfavorable results are missing.

Fewer than ten trial comparisons, too few to judge funnel plot asymmetry.

Baseline characteristics of the trials

The baseline value of each effect modifier or prognostic factor that applies here, per trial: mean or percent over arms, weighted by the number randomized. A note under a value names a stand in (a median for a mean, 100 minus the male share, Asian subgroup rows, an all Asian site list); "not reported" means no source of the trial prints it.
Baseline effect modifiers and prognostic factors per trial
TrialBaseline BMI or body weight (kg/m2)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 12 of 12
OUTSTAND-1
S000213
27.83
PIONEER 10
S000234
26.26
NCT04867785
S000489
35.08
NCT06589765
S000558
27.12
NCT02229383
S000703
33.7
NCT02229396
S000791
32.73
LIRA-SWITCH™
S001119
31.95
SUSTAIN
S001311
27.8
SUSTAIN™ 5
S001872
32.2
SUSTAIN™
S002082
25.43
NCT05048719
S002265
35.11
NCT02113332
S002357
33.6

Comparability of the trials

Checked across designs (the set of treatments each trial compares) for eligibility, outcome definition and assessment, and the baseline factors above. Flags point to possible intransitivity; notes describe variation that is not tied to design.
  • FlagBaseline, Baseline BMI or body weight: design means range from 26.3 (DULA_SC vs SEMA_PO) to 35.1 (DULA_SC vs ORFO_PO vs PLACEBO) kg/m2; threshold 3
  • NoteOutcome assessment, time point: selected time points span 24 to 32 weeks
  • NoteOutcome assessment, analysis set: mixed: full_analysis 5, modified_itt 4, randomized 2, safety 1
  • NoteOutcome assessment, intercurrent events (discontinuation): mixed: hypothetical 11, not stated 1
  • NoteRisk of bias, blinding: mixed: double_blind 10, open_label 1, single_blind 1
  • NoteData handling, input conversions: arms_combined 5
Comparability items per trial
Trialtime weeksanalysis setdefinitioninstrumentadjudicatedproportion methodintercurrent events (discontinuation)intercurrent events (rescue)blindingfundingstart yearEligibility
OUTSTAND-132randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2024age 18 to 75; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.0 percent; BMI 19.0 to 40.0; diet and exercise only
PIONEER 1026safetynot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalsingle_blindindustry2017Japanese adults 20 or older; T2D; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent on one oral glucose lowering drug
NCT0486778524modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2021age 18 to 75; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; BMI 25 to 50; diet and exercise or stable metformin
NCT0658976532randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2024age 18 to 75; HbA1c 7.5 to 11.0 percent; BMI 19 to 40; metformin monotherapy; eGFR 45 or more
NCT0222938328modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2014adults; insulin glargine 20 U/d or more with or without metformin; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent at randomization
NCT0222939628modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2014age 18 or older; HbA1c 8.0 to 12.0 percent on metformin 1500 mg/d or more
LIRA-SWITCH™26full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2013age 18 or more; HbA1c 7.5 to 9.5 percent; BMI 20 or more; on sitagliptin 100 mg and metformin for 90 days or more
SUSTAIN30full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2017Adults 18 or older, HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent on metformin monotherapy, eGFR 60 or more
SUSTAIN™ 530full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2014age 18 or older (20 in Japan); HbA1c 7.0 to 10.0 percent; stable basal insulin with or without metformin; eGFR 30 or more
SUSTAIN™30full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2014Japanese; age 20 or older; HbA1c 6.5 to 9.5 percent on one OAD or 7.0 to 10.5 percent on diet and exercise
NCT0504871926modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2021adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent, BMI 23 or more, diet or metformin
NCT0211333224full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2013T2D on multiple daily insulin injections; HbA1c 7.5 to 11.5 percent; BMI 27.5 to 45 kg/m2

Trial data

What each trial contributes. Arm rows give the arm value with its standard error, or events over participants; contrast rows give the mean difference on the analysis scale against the trial's first row. Flags mark converted, combined or approximated inputs.
Trial data entering this analysis
TrialArmTreatmentWeekDataValueSEEvents / NFlagsSource
OUTSTAND-1A3SAFIGL_PO32contrast, md-2.8502.074R0011607:Results
OUTSTAND-1A4PLACEBO32contrast, mdR0011607:Results
PIONEER 10A3SEMA_PO26contrast, md-3.0001.786R0018421:Supplement Table S4
PIONEER 10A4DULA_SC26contrast, mdR0018421:Supplement Table S4
NCT04867785A1PLACEBO24arm, change0.2402.15045R0013029:Supplement Table S4
NCT04867785A2DULA_SC24arm, change-1.1502.02046R0013029:Supplement Table S4
NCT04867785A3+A8RETA_SC24arm, change-6.9931.47889arms_combinedR0013029:Supplement Table S4
NCT06589765A1+A2+A3SAFIGL_PO32arm, change-3.6650.451449arms_combinedR0029347:Results
NCT06589765A4DAPAGLIFLOZIN32arm, change-4.6100.722183R0029347:Results
NCT02229383A1EXENER_SC28arm, change-2.6000.900231R0014763:Table 2
NCT02229383A2PLACEBO28arm, change-0.7000.900230R0014763:Table 2
NCT02229396A1DAPAEXEN_SC28arm, change-4.3000.800228R0024738:Results
NCT02229396A2EXENER_SC28arm, change-1.2000.800227R0024738:Results
NCT02229396A3DAPAGLIFLOZIN28arm, change-1.8000.800230R0024738:Results
LIRA-SWITCH™A1LIRA_SC26contrast, md-1.8701.227R0025720:Results
LIRA-SWITCH™A2SITAGLIPTIN26contrast, mdR0025720:Results
SUSTAINA1+A2SEMA_SC30arm, change-4.9530.647477arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
SUSTAINA3SITAGLIPTIN30arm, change-0.9000.853254registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN™ 5A2SEMA_SC30contrast, md-6.2901.850R0012671:Results
SUSTAIN™ 5A3PLACEBO30contrast, mdR0012671:Results
SUSTAIN™A1+A2SEMA_SC30arm, change-7.0410.821205arms_combinedR0014736:Table 3
SUSTAIN™A3SITAGLIPTIN30arm, change-2.8001.100103R0014736:Table 3
NCT05048719A1PLACEBO26arm, change-5.8001.65854R0004295:Supplement Table 1
NCT05048719A2+A3+A4+A5+A7ORFO_PO26arm, change-8.2390.755257arms_combinedR0004295:Supplement Table 1
NCT05048719A9DULA_SC26arm, change-8.0001.68450R0004295:Supplement Table 1
NCT02113332A1LIRA_SC24arm, change-4.6201.53061R0026157:Table 2
NCT02113332A2PLACEBO24arm, change0.8601.57058R0026157:Table 2

Rerun this analysis yourself

Remove treatments or trials and refit the frequentist and Bayesian models in your browser, with the same methods as the published analysis.

Open in the NMA lab