LivingGLP1
Network meta-analysis

Systolic blood pressure change

Overweight or obesity without diabetes (adults)

weeks 40 to 104 (target week 68)Hypothetical (as if everyone stayed on treatment)Each dose separatelyMean difference
2
Randomized trials
9
Treatments
1,086
Participants
10
Trial arms

In plain language

Across 2 trials with 1,086 participants, 0 of 8 treatments had a clearly better result than placebo on systolic blood pressure change, and for 8 the evidence could not tell them apart from placebo. The most favorable estimate was for Tirzepatide subcutaneous once weekly, maximum tolerated dose: 10 or 15 mg: mean difference -9.01 mmHg (95% credible interval -19.87 to 2.82).

Lower values favor the treatment. "Clearly" means the 95% credible interval excludes no difference. These are averages across trials; they do not say how any one person will respond. Not medical advice.

Network of trials

Each circle is a treatment; each line joins treatments that were randomized against each other in at least one trial.
BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-10MG_QWBIMASEMA_SC_1p0-30MG_QWBIMASEMA_SC_2p4-10MG_QWBIMASEMA_SC_2p4-30MG_QWOTHER_ACTIVE_bimagrumabPLACEBOSEMA_SC_1p0MG_QWSEMA_SC_2p4MG_QWTIRZ_SC_MTD_QW
Node area shows participants; line width shows trials comparing two treatments directly. Blue: GLP-1 receptor agonist containing treatments; grey: comparators. Hover over or tab to a node or line for details.

Effects compared with Placebo

Mean difference in mmHg. Lower values favor the treatment.
-20-1001020← favors treatmentfavors reference →Tirzepatide subcutaneous once we…Semaglutide and bimagrumab 2.4 t…Semaglutide 1.0 mg subcutaneous …Semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneous …Semaglutide and bimagrumab 2.4 t…Semaglutide and bimagrumab 1.0 t…Semaglutide and bimagrumab 1.0 t…Bimagrumab
Versus Placebo. Blue: Bayesian random effects posterior median with 95% credible interval (thick) and 95% prediction interval (dashed). Amber diamond: frequentist estimate with 95% confidence interval. Hover over or tab to a row for its values.
Effects of each treatment versus Placebo
TreatmentBayesian MD (95% CrI)95% prediction intervalFrequentist MD (95% CI)Verdict
Tirzepatide subcutaneous once weekly, maximum tolerated dose: 10 or 15 mg
TIRZ_SC_MTD_QW
-9.01 (-19.87 to 2.82)-24.60 to 8.03-9.20 (-11.14 to -7.26)Unclear
Semaglutide and bimagrumab 2.4 to 30 mg injection once weekly
BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-30MG_QW
-3.49 (-14.54 to 8.06)-19.54 to 12.78-3.50 (-8.80 to 1.80)Unclear
Semaglutide 1.0 mg subcutaneous once weekly
SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW
-1.70 (-13.38 to 9.82)-18.12 to 13.88-1.70 (-7.00 to 3.60)Unclear
Semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneous once weekly
SEMA_SC_2p4MG_QW
-1.09 (-12.81 to 10.28)-18.09 to 14.69-1.00 (-6.30 to 4.30)Unclear
Semaglutide and bimagrumab 2.4 to 10 mg injection once weekly
BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-10MG_QW
-1.06 (-13.21 to 10.00)-17.07 to 14.32-1.00 (-6.55 to 4.55)Unclear
Semaglutide and bimagrumab 1.0 to 30 mg injection once weekly
BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-30MG_QW
1.58 (-10.11 to 12.83)-15.20 to 16.791.60 (-3.35 to 6.55)Unclear
Semaglutide and bimagrumab 1.0 to 10 mg injection once weekly
BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-10MG_QW
2.44 (-9.10 to 13.30)-14.46 to 17.682.40 (-2.66 to 7.46)Unclear
Bimagrumab
OTHER_ACTIVE_bimagrumab
2.94 (-8.58 to 13.76)-13.66 to 18.433.06 (-1.91 to 8.03)Unclear

Ranking

How likely each treatment is to be among the best. Rankings ignore the size of differences and their certainty, so read them with the effects above.

League table

Every treatment against every other: mean difference of the row treatment versus the column treatment, posterior median and 95% credible interval. Green: row clearly better; red: row clearly worse.
Every treatment in a row compared with every treatment in a column
Row versus columnPLACEBOTIRZ_SC_MTD_QWBIMASEMA_SC_2p4-30MG_QWSEMA_SC_1p0MG_QWSEMA_SC_2p4MG_QWBIMASEMA_SC_2p4-10MG_QWBIMASEMA_SC_1p0-30MG_QWBIMASEMA_SC_1p0-10MG_QWOTHER_ACTIVE_bimagrumab
PLACEBOPLACEBO9.01
-2.82 to 19.87
3.49
-8.06 to 14.54
1.70
-9.82 to 13.38
1.09
-10.28 to 12.81
1.06
-10.00 to 13.21
-1.58
-12.83 to 10.11
-2.44
-13.30 to 9.10
-2.94
-13.76 to 8.58
TIRZ_SC_MTD_QW-9.01
-19.87 to 2.82
TIRZ_SC_MTD_QW-5.49
-20.63 to 10.98
-7.29
-22.59 to 9.71
-7.99
-22.96 to 8.90
-7.99
-23.04 to 9.09
-10.56
-25.43 to 5.85
-11.39
-25.88 to 5.14
-11.97
-26.82 to 4.39
BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-30MG_QW-3.49
-14.54 to 8.06
5.49
-10.98 to 20.63
BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-30MG_QW-1.80
-14.01 to 10.16
-2.46
-14.85 to 10.04
-2.43
-14.68 to 9.89
-5.04
-16.75 to 7.53
-5.84
-17.74 to 6.55
-6.44
-18.93 to 5.67
SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW-1.70
-13.38 to 9.82
7.29
-9.71 to 22.59
1.80
-10.16 to 14.01
SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW-0.64
-12.51 to 11.65
-0.61
-12.69 to 11.42
-3.18
-15.02 to 8.86
-3.99
-15.50 to 7.84
-4.68
-16.24 to 7.58
SEMA_SC_2p4MG_QW-1.09
-12.81 to 10.28
7.99
-8.90 to 22.96
2.46
-10.04 to 14.85
0.64
-11.65 to 12.51
SEMA_SC_2p4MG_QW0.05
-12.30 to 11.87
-2.60
-14.36 to 9.75
-3.38
-14.98 to 8.61
-4.01
-15.90 to 7.95
BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-10MG_QW-1.06
-13.21 to 10.00
7.99
-9.09 to 23.04
2.43
-9.89 to 14.68
0.61
-11.42 to 12.69
-0.05
-11.87 to 12.30
BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-10MG_QW-2.53
-14.59 to 10.11
-3.37
-15.25 to 8.53
-4.03
-16.06 to 8.21
BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-30MG_QW1.58
-10.11 to 12.83
10.56
-5.85 to 25.43
5.04
-7.53 to 16.75
3.18
-8.86 to 15.02
2.60
-9.75 to 14.36
2.53
-10.11 to 14.59
BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-30MG_QW-0.83
-12.71 to 10.92
-1.49
-13.58 to 10.05
BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-10MG_QW2.44
-9.10 to 13.30
11.39
-5.14 to 25.88
5.84
-6.55 to 17.74
3.99
-7.84 to 15.50
3.38
-8.61 to 14.98
3.37
-8.53 to 15.25
0.83
-10.92 to 12.71
BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-10MG_QW-0.66
-12.33 to 10.84
OTHER_ACTIVE_bimagrumab2.94
-8.58 to 13.76
11.97
-4.39 to 26.82
6.44
-5.67 to 18.93
4.68
-7.58 to 16.24
4.01
-7.95 to 15.90
4.03
-8.21 to 16.06
1.49
-10.05 to 13.58
0.66
-10.84 to 12.33
OTHER_ACTIVE_bimagrumab

Heterogeneity, fit and convergence

Bayesian random effects (primary)

Heterogeneity (tau)
3.513 (95% CrI 0.154 to 11.947)
Residual deviance
10.1 for 10 data points
DIC
20.2 (pD 10.1)
Largest R-hat
1.001
Smallest ESS
bulk 1,784, tail 3,147
Divergent transitions
0
Convergence
All criteria met
Priors
PR01 N(0, 60^2); PR03 N(0, 30^2); PR07 half normal(0, 6^2) on tau

Frequentist check (netmeta)

Method
inverse variance, REML, MD
Tau
0.000
Q (total)
0.00 on 0 df
Q (between designs)
0.00

Inconsistency

Do trials comparing two treatments directly agree with the indirect evidence through other treatments?

No comparison here has both direct and indirect evidence, so inconsistency cannot be checked by node splitting; the between designs Q above is the global check.

Small study effects

A comparison adjusted funnel plot: each point is one trial comparison, centered on its own network estimate. Asymmetry can signal that small trials with unfavorable results are missing.

Fewer than ten trial comparisons, too few to judge funnel plot asymmetry.

Baseline characteristics of the trials

The baseline value of each effect modifier or prognostic factor that applies here, per trial: mean or percent over arms, weighted by the number randomized. A note under a value names a stand in (a median for a mean, 100 minus the male share, Asian subgroup rows, an all Asian site list); "not reported" means no source of the trial prints it.
Baseline effect modifiers and prognostic factors per trial
TrialBaseline BMI or body weight (kg/m2)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 2 of 2
NCT05616013
S000715
37.3
SURMOUNT-3
S002157
35.9

Comparability of the trials

Checked across designs (the set of treatments each trial compares) for eligibility, outcome definition and assessment, and the baseline factors above. Flags point to possible intransitivity; notes describe variation that is not tied to design.
  • FlagOutcome assessment, analysis set: confounded with design: modified_itt 1, safety 1
  • FlagOutcome assessment, definition: confounded with design: change in systolic blood pressure from randomization 1, not stated 1
  • FlagRisk of bias, blinding: confounded with design: double_blind 1, open_label 1
  • FlagHeterogeneity, tau above threshold: tau 3.51 exceeds the outcome threshold 2; the flags of this network are candidate explanations
  • NoteOutcome assessment, time point: selected time points span 48 to 72 weeks
  • NoteData handling, input conversions: arms_combined 1, n_randomized 2
Comparability items per trial
Trialtime weeksanalysis setdefinitioninstrumentadjudicatedproportion methodintercurrent events (discontinuation)intercurrent events (rescue)blindingfundingstart yearEligibility
NCT0561601348safetynot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalnot statedopen_labelindustry2022adults 18 to 80; BMI 30 or more, or 27 or more with comorbidity; no diabetes (HbA1c below 6.5 percent); weight below 150 kg
SURMOUNT-372modified_ittchange in systolic blood pressure from randomizationnot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalnot stateddouble_blindindustry2021age 18 or older; BMI 30 or more, or 27 or more with comorbidity; no diabetes; at least 5 percent loss in lead in

Trial data

What each trial contributes. Arm rows give the arm value with its standard error, or events over participants; contrast rows give the mean difference on the analysis scale against the trial's first row. Flags mark converted, combined or approximated inputs.
Trial data entering this analysis
TrialArmTreatmentWeekDataValueSEEvents / NFlagsSource
NCT05616013A1PLACEBO48arm, change-6.9002.10056R0015266:Table 2
NCT05616013A2+A3OTHER_ACTIVE_bimagrumab48arm, change-3.8431.422113arms_combinedR0015266:Table 2
NCT05616013A4SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW48arm, change-8.6001.70056R0015266:Table 2
NCT05616013A5SEMA_SC_2p4MG_QW48arm, change-7.9001.70057R0015266:Table 2
NCT05616013A6BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-10MG_QW48arm, change-4.5001.50056R0015266:Table 2
NCT05616013A7BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-10MG_QW48arm, change-7.9001.90056R0015266:Table 2
NCT05616013A8BIMASEMA_SC_1p0-30MG_QW48arm, change-5.3001.40056R0015266:Table 2
NCT05616013A9BIMASEMA_SC_2p4-30MG_QW48arm, change-10.4001.70057R0015266:Table 2
SURMOUNT-3A1TIRZ_SC_MTD_QW72arm, change-5.1000.700287n_randomizedR0007405:Table 4
SURMOUNT-3A2PLACEBO72arm, change4.1000.700292n_randomizedR0007405:Table 4

Rerun this analysis yourself

Remove treatments or trials and refit the frequentist and Bayesian models in your browser, with the same methods as the published analysis.

Open in the NMA lab