LivingGLP1
Network meta-analysis

HbA1c change

Type 2 diabetes (adults); background therapy: one or more non insulin glucose lowering drugs

weeks 36 to 64 (target week 52)Hypothetical (as if everyone stayed on treatment)Doses of a drug pooledMean difference
12
Randomized trials
13
Treatments
7,637
Participants
24
Trial arms

In plain language

Across 12 trials with 7,637 participants, 4 of 12 treatments had a clearly better result than placebo on HbA1c change, and for 8 the evidence could not tell them apart from placebo. The most favorable estimate was for Tirzepatide injection: mean difference -2.20 percentage points (95% credible interval -3.20 to -0.31).

Lower values favor the treatment. "Clearly" means the 95% credible interval excludes no difference. These are averages across trials; they do not say how any one person will respond. Not medical advice.

Network of trials

Each circle is a treatment; each line joins treatments that were randomized against each other in at least one trial.
ALBI_SCCANAGLIFLOZINDULA_SCEXENER_SCEXEN_SCINS_DEGLUDECINS_GLARGINEORFO_POPLACEBOSEMA_POSEMA_SCSITAGLIPTINTIRZ_SC
Node area shows participants; line width shows trials comparing two treatments directly. Blue: GLP-1 receptor agonist containing treatments; grey: comparators. Hover over or tab to a node or line for details.

Effects compared with Placebo

Mean difference in percentage points. Lower values favor the treatment.
-3-2-101← favors treatmentfavors reference →Tirzepatide injectionOrforglipron tabletSemaglutide injectionInsulin degludecSemaglutide tabletDulaglutide injectionExenatide extended release injec…CanagliflozinSitagliptinInsulin glargineExenatide injectionAlbiglutide injection
Versus Placebo. Blue: Bayesian random effects posterior median with 95% credible interval (thick) and 95% prediction interval (dashed). Amber diamond: frequentist estimate with 95% confidence interval. Hover over or tab to a row for its values.
Effects of each treatment versus Placebo
TreatmentBayesian MD (95% CrI)95% prediction intervalFrequentist MD (95% CI)Verdict
Tirzepatide injection
TIRZ_SC
-2.20 (-3.20 to -0.31)-3.43 to 0.01-2.53 (-2.90 to -2.15)Better
Orforglipron tablet
ORFO_PO
-2.00 (-2.85 to -0.48)-3.22 to -0.14-2.15 (-2.38 to -1.92)Better
Semaglutide injection
SEMA_SC
-1.78 (-2.84 to -0.57)-3.10 to -0.26-2.00 (-2.90 to -1.10)Better
Insulin degludec
INS_DEGLUDEC
-1.37 (-2.54 to 0.83)-2.75 to 1.08-1.70 (-2.10 to -1.31)Unclear
Semaglutide tablet
SEMA_PO
-1.26 (-1.83 to -0.24)-2.23 to 0.21-1.40 (-1.60 to -1.20)Better
Dulaglutide injection
DULA_SC
-1.15 (-1.87 to 0.24)-2.20 to 0.61-1.38 (-1.69 to -1.07)Unclear
Exenatide extended release injection
EXENER_SC
-1.15 (-2.39 to 0.40)-2.67 to 0.67-1.38 (-2.30 to -0.46)Unclear
Canagliflozin
CANAGLIFLOZIN
-1.07 (-2.34 to 0.47)-2.57 to 0.73-1.30 (-2.21 to -0.39)Unclear
Sitagliptin
SITAGLIPTIN
-0.85 (-1.74 to 0.59)-2.10 to 0.92-1.00 (-1.32 to -0.68)Unclear
Insulin glargine
INS_GLARGINE
-0.81 (-1.65 to 0.83)-1.94 to 1.15-1.09 (-1.43 to -0.75)Unclear
Exenatide injection
EXEN_SC
-0.74 (-1.77 to 1.03)-2.03 to 1.32-0.96 (-1.33 to -0.60)Unclear
Albiglutide injection
ALBI_SC
-0.69 (-1.73 to 1.22)-1.94 to 1.48-0.97 (-1.34 to -0.60)Unclear

Ranking

How likely each treatment is to be among the best. Rankings ignore the size of differences and their certainty, so read them with the effects above.

League table

Every treatment against every other: mean difference of the row treatment versus the column treatment, posterior median and 95% credible interval. Green: row clearly better; red: row clearly worse.
Every treatment in a row compared with every treatment in a column
Row versus columnPLACEBOTIRZ_SCORFO_POSEMA_SCINS_DEGLUDECSEMA_PODULA_SCEXENER_SCCANAGLIFLOZINSITAGLIPTININS_GLARGINEEXEN_SCALBI_SC
PLACEBOPLACEBO2.20
0.31 to 3.20
2.00
0.48 to 2.85
1.78
0.57 to 2.84
1.37
-0.83 to 2.54
1.26
0.24 to 1.83
1.15
-0.24 to 1.87
1.15
-0.40 to 2.39
1.07
-0.47 to 2.34
0.85
-0.59 to 1.74
0.81
-0.83 to 1.65
0.74
-1.03 to 1.77
0.69
-1.22 to 1.73
TIRZ_SC-2.20
-3.20 to -0.31
TIRZ_SC-0.24
-1.62 to 1.63
-0.35
-1.95 to 1.71
-0.83
-1.84 to 0.04
-0.96
-2.03 to 0.68
-1.06
-2.10 to 0.34
-1.01
-2.70 to 1.18
-1.08
-2.80 to 1.18
-1.38
-2.74 to 0.49
-1.40
-2.20 to -0.41
-1.48
-2.83 to 0.16
-1.52
-2.72 to -0.15
ORFO_PO-2.00
-2.85 to -0.48
0.24
-1.63 to 1.62
ORFO_PO-0.16
-1.62 to 1.57
-0.60
-2.71 to 0.95
-0.72
-1.58 to 0.29
-0.82
-2.12 to 0.38
-0.80
-2.50 to 1.12
-0.88
-2.62 to 1.10
-1.14
-2.39 to 0.22
-1.15
-2.77 to 0.09
-1.23
-2.80 to 0.24
-1.27
-3.07 to 0.17
SEMA_SC-1.78
-2.84 to -0.57
0.35
-1.71 to 1.95
0.16
-1.57 to 1.62
SEMA_SC-0.49
-2.75 to 1.22
-0.56
-1.98 to 0.74
-0.67
-2.34 to 0.72
-0.63
-1.58 to 0.23
-0.71
-1.70 to 0.21
-0.98
-2.69 to 0.56
-1.03
-2.84 to 0.41
-1.08
-3.05 to 0.53
-1.16
-3.15 to 0.44
INS_DEGLUDEC-1.37
-2.54 to 0.83
0.83
-0.04 to 1.84
0.60
-0.95 to 2.71
0.49
-1.22 to 2.75
INS_DEGLUDEC-0.12
-1.38 to 1.79
-0.23
-1.47 to 1.50
-0.17
-1.98 to 2.30
-0.25
-2.09 to 2.25
-0.53
-2.07 to 1.57
-0.56
-1.66 to 0.82
-0.64
-2.13 to 1.30
-0.69
-2.07 to 1.03
SEMA_PO-1.26
-1.83 to -0.24
0.96
-0.68 to 2.03
0.72
-0.29 to 1.58
0.56
-0.74 to 1.98
0.12
-1.79 to 1.38
SEMA_PO-0.10
-1.07 to 0.62
-0.08
-1.61 to 1.54
-0.16
-1.71 to 1.47
-0.41
-1.38 to 0.47
-0.43
-1.76 to 0.47
-0.51
-1.92 to 0.60
-0.56
-2.18 to 0.61
DULA_SC-1.15
-1.87 to 0.24
1.06
-0.34 to 2.10
0.82
-0.38 to 2.12
0.67
-0.72 to 2.34
0.23
-1.50 to 1.47
0.10
-0.62 to 1.07
DULA_SC0.02
-1.55 to 1.90
-0.05
-1.63 to 1.82
-0.31
-1.48 to 1.04
-0.33
-1.29 to 0.41
-0.42
-1.34 to 0.52
-0.46
-1.75 to 0.67
EXENER_SC-1.15
-2.39 to 0.40
1.01
-1.18 to 2.70
0.80
-1.12 to 2.50
0.63
-0.23 to 1.58
0.17
-2.30 to 1.98
0.08
-1.54 to 1.61
-0.02
-1.90 to 1.55
EXENER_SC-0.07
-1.34 to 1.20
-0.34
-2.21 to 1.41
-0.38
-2.39 to 1.21
-0.44
-2.59 to 1.32
-0.51
-2.67 to 1.28
CANAGLIFLOZIN-1.07
-2.34 to 0.47
1.08
-1.18 to 2.80
0.88
-1.10 to 2.62
0.71
-0.21 to 1.70
0.25
-2.25 to 2.09
0.16
-1.47 to 1.71
0.05
-1.82 to 1.63
0.07
-1.20 to 1.34
CANAGLIFLOZIN-0.26
-2.14 to 1.43
-0.30
-2.37 to 1.30
-0.37
-2.49 to 1.45
-0.43
-2.59 to 1.36
SITAGLIPTIN-0.85
-1.74 to 0.59
1.38
-0.49 to 2.74
1.14
-0.22 to 2.39
0.98
-0.56 to 2.69
0.53
-1.57 to 2.07
0.41
-0.47 to 1.38
0.31
-1.04 to 1.48
0.34
-1.41 to 2.21
0.26
-1.43 to 2.14
SITAGLIPTIN-0.03
-1.65 to 1.27
-0.10
-1.83 to 1.40
-0.15
-2.02 to 1.31
INS_GLARGINE-0.81
-1.65 to 0.83
1.40
0.41 to 2.20
1.15
-0.09 to 2.77
1.03
-0.41 to 2.84
0.56
-0.82 to 1.66
0.43
-0.47 to 1.76
0.33
-0.41 to 1.29
0.38
-1.21 to 2.39
0.30
-1.30 to 2.37
0.03
-1.27 to 1.65
INS_GLARGINE-0.09
-1.22 to 1.25
-0.13
-1.02 to 0.80
EXEN_SC-0.74
-1.77 to 1.03
1.48
-0.16 to 2.83
1.23
-0.24 to 2.80
1.08
-0.53 to 3.05
0.64
-1.30 to 2.13
0.51
-0.60 to 1.92
0.42
-0.52 to 1.34
0.44
-1.32 to 2.59
0.37
-1.45 to 2.49
0.10
-1.40 to 1.83
0.09
-1.25 to 1.22
EXEN_SC-0.04
-1.60 to 1.38
ALBI_SC-0.69
-1.73 to 1.22
1.52
0.15 to 2.72
1.27
-0.17 to 3.07
1.16
-0.44 to 3.15
0.69
-1.03 to 2.07
0.56
-0.61 to 2.18
0.46
-0.67 to 1.75
0.51
-1.28 to 2.67
0.43
-1.36 to 2.59
0.15
-1.31 to 2.02
0.13
-0.80 to 1.02
0.04
-1.38 to 1.60
ALBI_SC

Heterogeneity, fit and convergence

Bayesian random effects (primary)

Heterogeneity (tau)
0.311 (95% CrI 0.014 to 0.940)
Residual deviance
21.1 for 21 data points
DIC
42.1 (pD 21.0)
Largest R-hat
1.005
Smallest ESS
bulk 960, tail 2,093
Divergent transitions
0
Convergence
All criteria met
Priors
PR01 N(0, 5^2); PR03 N(0, 2.5^2); PR07 half normal(0, 0.5^2) on tau

Frequentist check (netmeta)

Method
inverse variance, REML, MD
Tau
0.000
Q (total)
0.00 on 0 df
Q (between designs)
0.00

Inconsistency

Do trials comparing two treatments directly agree with the indirect evidence through other treatments?

No comparison here has both direct and indirect evidence, so inconsistency cannot be checked by node splitting; the between designs Q above is the global check.

Small study effects

A comparison adjusted funnel plot: each point is one trial comparison, centered on its own network estimate. Asymmetry can signal that small trials with unfavorable results are missing.

Fewer than ten trial comparisons, too few to judge funnel plot asymmetry.

Baseline characteristics of the trials

The baseline value of each effect modifier or prognostic factor that applies here, per trial: mean or percent over arms, weighted by the number randomized. A note under a value names a stand in (a median for a mean, 100 minus the male share, Asian subgroup rows, an all Asian site list); "not reported" means no source of the trial prints it.
Baseline effect modifiers and prognostic factors per trial
TrialBaseline HbA1c (percent)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 12 of 12
Background glucose lowering therapy (stratum S0 to S4)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 12 of 12
Diabetes duration (years)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 11 of 12
Asian ancestry or region (percent Asian)
effect modifier, prognostic factor; 11 of 12
Age (years)
prognostic factor; 12 of 12
Treatment duration (weeks)
effect modifier; 12 of 12
NCT00838916
S000099
8.31S18.735.13
Asian subgroup rows
55.43156
PIONEER 4
S000133
7.98S17.613.456.252
PIONEER 10
S000234
8.31S19.3610058.4352
SUSTAIN™ 3
S000329
8.34S19.2not reported56.5556
ACHIEVE-3
S000438
8.29S18.711.953.9352
NCT04093752
S000909
8.71S17.6397.2754.1340
AWARD-2
S001130
8.14S19.116.9156.6678
PIONEER 7
S001153
7.93S18.7115.0857.64104
NCT05486065
S001555
8.35S16.961.4952.7640
SURPASS-3
S001591
8.17S18.45.457.452
SUSTAIN 8
S001847
8.25S1not reported15.8656.652
AWARD-1
S002153
8.07S18.772.4555.6552

Comparability of the trials

Checked across designs (the set of treatments each trial compares) for eligibility, outcome definition and assessment, and the baseline factors above. Flags point to possible intransitivity; notes describe variation that is not tied to design.
  • FlagBaseline, Baseline HbA1c: design means range from 7.9 (SEMA_PO vs SITAGLIPTIN) to 8.7 (INS_GLARGINE vs TIRZ_SC) percent; threshold 0.5
  • FlagBaseline, Asian ancestry or region: design means range from 1.5 (PLACEBO vs SEMA_SC) to 100.0 (DULA_SC vs SEMA_PO) percent Asian; threshold 30
  • FlagBaseline, Treatment duration: design means range from 40.0 (INS_GLARGINE vs TIRZ_SC) to 156.0 (ALBI_SC vs INS_GLARGINE) weeks; threshold 26
  • FlagHeterogeneity, tau above threshold: tau 0.31 exceeds the outcome threshold 0.3; the flags of this network are candidate explanations
  • NoteOutcome assessment, time point: selected time points span 40 to 56 weeks
  • NoteOutcome assessment, analysis set: mixed: full_analysis 5, modified_itt 6, randomized 1
  • NoteOutcome assessment, intercurrent events (discontinuation): mixed: hypothetical 8, not stated 4
  • NoteOutcome assessment, intercurrent events (rescue): mixed: hypothetical 11, not stated 1
  • NoteRisk of bias, blinding: mixed: double_blind 4, open_label 7, single_blind 1
  • NoteData handling, input conversions: arms_combined 7
Comparability items per trial
Trialtime weeksanalysis setdefinitioninstrumentadjudicatedproportion methodintercurrent events (discontinuation)intercurrent events (rescue)blindingfundingstart yearEligibility
NCT0083891652modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2009age 18 or older, HbA1c 7.0 to 10.0 percent, BMI 20 to 45, creatinine clearance above 60
PIONEER 452full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2016Age 18 or older; T2D on metformin with or without SGLT2i; HbA1c 7.0 to 9.5 percent; eGFR 60 or more
PIONEER 1052full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalsingle_blindindustry2017Japanese adults 20 or older; T2D; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent on one oral glucose lowering drug
SUSTAIN™ 356full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2013age 18 or older; T2D on stable 1 to 2 oral drugs; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; eGFR 60 or more
ACHIEVE-352modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2023adults T2D on metformin; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent
NCT0409375240modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2019adults with T2D on metformin with or without sulfonylurea
AWARD-252modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2010type 2 diabetes on metformin and glimepiride
PIONEER 752randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2016age 18 or more; HbA1c 7.5 to 9.5 percent; one or two oral glucose lowering drugs
NCT0548606540full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2022age 18 to 64; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5; BMI 27 or more; on metformin
SURPASS-352modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticalhypotheticalopen_labelindustry2019insulin naive; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; BMI at least 25; metformin with or without SGLT2i; eGFR above 45
SUSTAIN 852full_analysisnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindindustry2017age 18 or older; HbA1c 7.0 to 10.5 percent; eGFR 60 or higher; metformin 1500 mg or maximum tolerated
AWARD-152modified_ittnot statednot statednot statednot statednot statedhypotheticaldouble_blindindustry2010adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin and pioglitazone

Trial data

What each trial contributes. Arm rows give the arm value with its standard error, or events over participants; contrast rows give the mean difference on the analysis scale against the trial's first row. Flags mark converted, combined or approximated inputs.
Trial data entering this analysis
TrialArmTreatmentWeekDataValueSEEvents / NFlagsSource
NCT00838916A1ALBI_SC52arm, change-0.6700.044493registry:outcomes
NCT00838916A2INS_GLARGINE52arm, change-0.7900.064238registry:outcomes
PIONEER 4A1SEMA_PO52contrast, md-1.4000.102R0015836:Figure 2B
PIONEER 4A3PLACEBO52contrast, mdR0015836:Figure 2B
PIONEER 10A1+A2+A3SEMA_PO52arm, change-1.3200.063329arms_combinedR0018421:Figure 2D
PIONEER 10A4DULA_SC52arm, change-1.3000.10056R0018421:Figure 2D
SUSTAIN™ 3A1SEMA_SC56arm, change-1.5400.060404registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN™ 3A2EXENER_SC56arm, change-0.9200.060405registry:outcomes
ACHIEVE-3A1+A2ORFO_PO52arm, change-2.0340.039648arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
ACHIEVE-3A3+A4SEMA_PO52arm, change-1.2870.044676arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
NCT04093752A1+A2+A3TIRZ_SC40arm, change-2.3860.042598arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
NCT04093752A4INS_GLARGINE40arm, change-0.9500.073193registry:outcomes
AWARD-2A1+A2DULA_SC52arm, change-0.9190.043530arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
AWARD-2A3INS_GLARGINE52arm, change-0.6300.060259registry:outcomes
PIONEER 7A3SEMA_PO52contrast, md-0.4000.128R0023369:Results
PIONEER 7A4SITAGLIPTIN52contrast, mdR0023369:Results
NCT05486065A1SEMA_SC40contrast, md-2.0000.459R0005510:Figure 1
NCT05486065A4PLACEBO40contrast, mdR0005510:Figure 1
SURPASS-3A1+A2+A3TIRZ_SC52arm, change-2.1620.029897arms_combinedR0007531:Table 2
SURPASS-3A4INS_DEGLUDEC52arm, change-1.3400.050317R0007531:Table 2
SUSTAIN 8A1SEMA_SC52arm, change-1.7000.055394registry:outcomes
SUSTAIN 8A2CANAGLIFLOZIN52arm, change-1.0000.050394registry:outcomes
AWARD-1A1+A2DULA_SC52arm, change-1.2160.057540arms_combinedregistry:outcomes
AWARD-1A3EXEN_SC52arm, change-0.8000.080266registry:outcomes

Rerun this analysis yourself

Remove treatments or trials and refit the frequentist and Bayesian models in your browser, with the same methods as the published analysis.

Open in the NMA lab