LivingGLP1
Network meta-analysis

Serious adverse events

Chronic kidney disease with diabetes

longest follow-upRecorded harmsEach dose separatelyHazard ratio (from event counts)Separate part 2 of a disconnected network
6
Randomized trials
8
Treatments
1,132
Participants
105
Events

In plain language

Across 6 trials with 1,132 participants, 0 of 7 treatments had a clearly better result than placebo on serious adverse events, and for 7 the evidence could not tell them apart from placebo. The most favorable estimate was for Liraglutide 1.8 mg subcutaneous once daily: hazard ratio (from event counts) 0.93 (95% credible interval 0.27 to 3.22).

Lower values favor the treatment. "Clearly" means the 95% credible interval excludes no difference. These are averages across trials; they do not say how any one person will respond. Not medical advice.

Network of trials

Each circle is a treatment; each line joins treatments that were randomized against each other in at least one trial.
COTA_SC_300UG_QDHRS7535_PO_30MG_QDHRS7535_PO_90MG_QDLIRA_SC_1p8MG_QDLIXI_SC_20UG_QDPLACEBOSEMA_PO_14MG_QDSEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW
Node area shows participants; line width shows trials comparing two treatments directly. Blue: GLP-1 receptor agonist containing treatments; grey: comparators. Hover over or tab to a node or line for details.

Effects compared with Placebo

Hazard ratio (from event counts). Lower values favor the treatment.
0.10.20.250.512451020← favors treatmentfavors reference →Liraglutide 1.8 mg subcutaneous …Cotadutide 300 ug subcutaneous o…Semaglutide 14 mg oral once dail…Semaglutide 1.0 mg subcutaneous …Lixisenatide 20 ug subcutaneous …HRS-7535 90 mg tablet once dailyHRS-7535 30 mg tablet once daily
Versus Placebo, log scale. Blue: Bayesian random effects posterior median with 95% credible interval (thick) and 95% prediction interval (dashed). Amber diamond: frequentist estimate with 95% confidence interval. Hover over or tab to a row for its values.
Effects of each treatment versus Placebo
TreatmentBayesian HR (95% CrI)95% prediction intervalFrequentist HR (95% CI)Verdict
Liraglutide 1.8 mg subcutaneous once daily
LIRA_SC_1p8MG_QD
0.93 (0.27 to 3.22)0.16 to 5.000.92 (0.43 to 1.98)Unclear
Cotadutide 300 ug subcutaneous once daily
COTA_SC_300UG_QD
0.96 (0.11 to 8.41)0.09 to 11.09Unclear
Semaglutide 14 mg oral once daily (original tablet)
SEMA_PO_14MG_QD
0.98 (0.28 to 3.68)0.19 to 5.340.99 (0.48 to 2.01)Unclear
Semaglutide 1.0 mg subcutaneous once weekly
SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW
1.42 (0.36 to 6.06)0.25 to 8.761.47 (0.48 to 4.48)Unclear
Lixisenatide 20 ug subcutaneous once daily
LIXI_SC_20UG_QD
1.59 (0.30 to 9.25)0.22 to 12.701.70 (0.38 to 7.54)Unclear
HRS-7535 90 mg tablet once daily
HRS7535_PO_90MG_QD
1.68 (0.29 to 11.25)0.22 to 14.81Unclear
HRS-7535 30 mg tablet once daily
HRS7535_PO_30MG_QD
2.21 (0.43 to 14.18)0.31 to 18.39Unclear

Ranking

How likely each treatment is to be among the best. Rankings ignore the size of differences and their certainty, so read them with the effects above.

League table

Every treatment against every other: hazard ratio (from event counts) of the row treatment versus the column treatment, posterior median and 95% credible interval. Green: row clearly better; red: row clearly worse.
Every treatment in a row compared with every treatment in a column
Row versus columnPLACEBOLIRA_SC_1p8MG_QDCOTA_SC_300UG_QDSEMA_PO_14MG_QDSEMA_SC_1p0MG_QWLIXI_SC_20UG_QDHRS7535_PO_90MG_QDHRS7535_PO_30MG_QD
PLACEBOPLACEBO1.08
0.31 to 3.70
1.04
0.12 to 8.89
1.02
0.27 to 3.54
0.71
0.16 to 2.77
0.63
0.11 to 3.29
0.60
0.09 to 3.45
0.45
0.07 to 2.33
LIRA_SC_1p8MG_QD0.93
0.27 to 3.22
LIRA_SC_1p8MG_QD0.97
0.08 to 10.84
0.93
0.16 to 5.74
0.65
0.10 to 3.89
0.57
0.07 to 4.31
0.54
0.06 to 4.50
0.41
0.05 to 3.31
COTA_SC_300UG_QD0.96
0.11 to 8.41
1.03
0.09 to 11.98
COTA_SC_300UG_QD0.97
0.08 to 12.13
0.67
0.05 to 8.88
0.58
0.04 to 8.54
0.56
0.03 to 9.65
0.43
0.02 to 7.30
SEMA_PO_14MG_QD0.98
0.28 to 3.68
1.07
0.17 to 6.13
1.03
0.08 to 11.97
SEMA_PO_14MG_QD0.68
0.10 to 4.56
0.60
0.07 to 4.78
0.58
0.06 to 4.93
0.45
0.05 to 3.37
SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW1.42
0.36 to 6.06
1.55
0.26 to 9.95
1.50
0.11 to 20.50
1.46
0.22 to 9.57
SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW0.88
0.10 to 7.69
0.85
0.08 to 7.73
0.64
0.06 to 5.45
LIXI_SC_20UG_QD1.59
0.30 to 9.25
1.75
0.23 to 14.87
1.72
0.12 to 26.13
1.66
0.21 to 14.16
1.14
0.13 to 10.50
LIXI_SC_20UG_QD0.95
0.08 to 11.74
0.73
0.06 to 7.66
HRS7535_PO_90MG_QD1.68
0.29 to 11.25
1.85
0.22 to 17.13
1.79
0.10 to 30.93
1.72
0.20 to 17.92
1.18
0.13 to 11.77
1.06
0.09 to 12.96
HRS7535_PO_90MG_QD0.77
0.14 to 4.06
HRS7535_PO_30MG_QD2.21
0.43 to 14.18
2.43
0.30 to 21.37
2.31
0.14 to 40.37
2.23
0.30 to 20.63
1.55
0.18 to 15.77
1.36
0.13 to 15.67
1.30
0.25 to 7.19
HRS7535_PO_30MG_QD

Heterogeneity, fit and convergence

Bayesian random effects (primary)

Heterogeneity (tau)
0.356 (95% CrI 0.085 to 1.250), log scale
Residual deviance
12.5 for 13 data points
DIC
24.9 (pD 12.4)
Largest R-hat
1.001
Smallest ESS
bulk 4,369, tail 3,563
Divergent transitions
0
Convergence
All criteria met
Priors
PR02 N(0, 5^2); PR05 N(0, 2.5^2); PR09 log normal(-1.87, 1.52^2) on tau^2 (Adverse events, pharm vs placebo control)

Frequentist check (netmeta)

Method
inverse variance, REML, OR
Tau
0.000
Q (total)
0.00 on 0 df
Q (between designs)
0.00

Inconsistency

Do trials comparing two treatments directly agree with the indirect evidence through other treatments?

No comparison here has both direct and indirect evidence, so inconsistency cannot be checked by node splitting; the between designs Q above is the global check.

Small study effects

A comparison adjusted funnel plot: each point is one trial comparison, centered on its own network estimate. Asymmetry can signal that small trials with unfavorable results are missing.

Fewer than ten trial comparisons, too few to judge funnel plot asymmetry.

Comparability of the trials

Checked across designs (the set of treatments each trial compares) for eligibility, outcome definition and assessment, and the baseline factors above. Flags point to possible intransitivity; notes describe variation that is not tied to design.
  • NoteOutcome assessment, time point: selected time points span 8.43 to 57 weeks
  • NoteOutcome assessment, analysis set: mixed: randomized 2, safety 4
  • NoteOutcome assessment, definition: mixed: level 3 severe hypoglycemia 1, not stated 4, severe hypoglycemia 1
Comparability items per trial
Trialfundingtime weeksanalysis setdefinitioninstrumentadjudicatedproportion methodintercurrent events (discontinuation)intercurrent events (rescue)blindingstart yearEligibility
REMODELindustry57randomizedsevere hypoglycemianot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blind2021T2D with HbA1c 9.0 percent or less; eGFR 30 to 75; UACR 20 to under 5000 mg/g
SOLID-DKDindustry18safetylevel 3 severe hypoglycemianot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blind2024age 18 to 75; T2D with UACR 300 to below 3000 mg/g; eGFR 30 or more; HbA1c 6.5 to 10; BMI 20 to 40
NCT01620489industry27safetynot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blind2012type 2 diabetes; eGFR 30 to 59 mL/min/1.73m2 (MDRD); oral drugs and/or insulin
PIONEER 5industry31safetynot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blind2016type 2 diabetes; HbA1c 7.0 to 9.5 percent; moderate renal impairment
NCT03550378industry8.43safetynot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blind2018age 18 to 84; BMI 25 to 45; eGFR 30 to 59; HbA1c 6.5 to 10.5 percent
S002858industry24randomizednot statednot statednot statednot statednot statednot stateddouble_blindT2D age over 35; clinical CKD; eGFR above 30 mL/min; stable ACE inhibitor or ARB

Trial data

What each trial contributes. Arm rows give the arm value with its standard error, or events over participants; contrast rows give the hazard ratio (from event counts) on the analysis scale (log) against the trial's first row. Flags mark converted, combined or approximated inputs.
Trial data entering this analysis
TrialArmTreatmentWeekDataValueSEEvents / NFlagsSource
REMODELA1SEMA_SC_1p0MG_QW57arm, events14 / 71R0007381:Extended Data Table 5
REMODELA2PLACEBO57arm, events5 / 35R0007381:Extended Data Table 5
SOLID-DKDA1HRS7535_PO_30MG_QD18arm, events5 / 93R0004355:Table 2
SOLID-DKDA2HRS7535_PO_90MG_QD18arm, events4 / 94R0004355:Table 2
SOLID-DKDA3PLACEBO18arm, events2 / 94R0004355:Table 2
NCT01620489A1LIRA_SC_1p8MG_QD27arm, events14 / 140registry:adverse_events
NCT01620489A2PLACEBO27arm, events15 / 139registry:adverse_events
PIONEER 5A1SEMA_PO_14MG_QD31arm, events17 / 163registry:adverse_events
PIONEER 5A2PLACEBO31arm, events17 / 161registry:adverse_events
NCT03550378A1COTA_SC_300UG_QD8.43arm, events2 / 21R0019218:Table 2
NCT03550378A2PLACEBO8.43arm, events2 / 20R0019218:Table 2
S002858A1LIXI_SC_20UG_QD24arm, events5 / 51R0001573:Supplement Table S2
S002858A2PLACEBO24arm, events3 / 50R0001573:Supplement Table S2

Rerun this analysis yourself

Remove treatments or trials and refit the frequentist and Bayesian models in your browser, with the same methods as the published analysis.

Open in the NMA lab